From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1Hiyff-000579-BT for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 01 May 2007 20:09:59 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l41K85sf017578; Tue, 1 May 2007 20:08:05 GMT Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com (mu-out-0910.google.com [209.85.134.190]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l41K65Da015265 for ; Tue, 1 May 2007 20:06:05 GMT Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id w8so2392652mue for ; Tue, 01 May 2007 13:06:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id:sender; b=sZviGhBWdnrzkPV9a73DliyVgJ9W4/iZwQV3X3frlnCoGjSVQP/J46hLdTW6xHDU+0fQnQ3FzU1HtWdaq9uqlAv8MHUO2AGkZrrqIk46l+5gEEbqdrVlQgih9v7upzKHGdpn+ut7O9AFbyYjR9kDXKZV69Vy3dTw549tYvSiQ7w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id:sender; b=plNHsp6EnXf6wSvQLmZFIDPUFCsqNvdYt8vFkhllSEJmK9bOte09/pccRr5mpPIyoAqvREM02AkWmDGH/gPVOAEvLDjB0mdJnXFT04yKq+HttafdXZ+ueMq0LQiKB9k8RVfe4Jx6cE5OVque46SR/mwI5X1JaV25ykWw8hE0Pu4= Received: by 10.82.189.6 with SMTP id m6mr14796278buf.1178049964422; Tue, 01 May 2007 13:06:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from phoebe.lan ( [82.210.165.130]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y34sm5595273iky.2007.05.01.13.06.01; Tue, 01 May 2007 13:06:02 -0700 (PDT) From: Piotr =?utf-8?q?Jaroszy=C5=84ski?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] tests Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 22:05:54 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <200705011508.57220.peper@gentoo.org> <20070501183522.7531c0c9@snowflake> <20070501195336.GA23900@kfk4ever.com> In-Reply-To: <20070501195336.GA23900@kfk4ever.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200705012205.54594.peper@gentoo.org> Sender: =?UTF-8?B?UGlvdHIgSmFyb3N6ecWEc2tp?= X-Archives-Salt: 2a5745e7-81df-4b7f-9d94-262a8e58ad10 X-Archives-Hash: 37d13a3cd486a9cb900ee84809a08f51 On Tuesday 01 of May 2007 21:53:36 Maurice van der Pot wrote: > I'm not sure why this is a reply to my message instead of the message I > replied to. They both provide more or less the same choice to the user. Err I wasn't providing any choices for users yet, I only thought about the= =20 below as things that can be wanted by users/devs and asked whether I missed= =20 something. How we will end up distinguishing them is another story... > - run all tests > - run only reasonable tests > - run only necessary tests > - don't run tests at all =2D-=20 Best Regards, Piotr Jaroszy=C5=84ski -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list