From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HiwgQ-0001Jq-V0 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 01 May 2007 18:02:40 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l41I0pvq032577; Tue, 1 May 2007 18:00:51 GMT Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.168]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l41HwZWY028268 for ; Tue, 1 May 2007 17:58:35 GMT Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id z38so82804ugc for ; Tue, 01 May 2007 10:58:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id:sender; b=smzxwNkS7qogMVBvV0PdcMPCOhMIN+r3pQEO4AOuNFX8jz0vaNdLmEtYbtK2OuoBJNsHgHw8pjWBu3ia7JaB50gP6RXARwntRYb62iK3awK2Vfc4PFWpRyubfqBDt6ydx1n4Itpl7QVSbcObbHKPUmlrtqbBo5tHjA4cvGMXP80= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id:sender; b=m1cJHSef+r7uRSCaBPcglREtewGSgcr4kJ2QGKJLkzH1aP+eSwXZP/I/zsSgKw1ySrPM/oezm8fojRYKlHkwhNwDoFYADijy+8NX7WXrrzlFty4mdRjauvfWbGvDb4kPIMFClVQtuEpAoaa2ssH+FW2c3V+4lgOPPiXkkpmsWCY= Received: by 10.82.185.12 with SMTP id i12mr14442430buf.1178042315603; Tue, 01 May 2007 10:58:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from phoebe.lan ( [82.210.165.130]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c22sm3876026ika.2007.05.01.10.58.33; Tue, 01 May 2007 10:58:34 -0700 (PDT) From: Piotr =?utf-8?q?Jaroszy=C5=84ski?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] tests Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 19:58:26 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <200705011508.57220.peper@gentoo.org> <20070501171828.GL10636@kfk4ever.com> In-Reply-To: <20070501171828.GL10636@kfk4ever.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200705011958.26707.peper@gentoo.org> Sender: =?UTF-8?B?UGlvdHIgSmFyb3N6ecWEc2tp?= X-Archives-Salt: 969b9d44-2099-4532-8b3c-de0aa03b958f X-Archives-Hash: 7f1d9ff974071321fff9394199910d47 On Tuesday 01 of May 2007 19:18:28 Maurice van der Pot wrote: > Isn't it easier to list a set of boolean properties of _individual_ > tests? It was just a list of different test classes, which came to mind. The=20 question, which still persist, was how precisely we want to divide them int= o=20 groups as current boolean choice seems to be not enough. > I'd say, let the user decide based on the properties, fex: It seems to be too early for that. Firstly we should figure out=20 the "properties" and then we can think how to deliver them for end-users. =2D-=20 Best Regards, Piotr Jaroszy=C5=84ski -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list