From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HisW8-0000OG-BE for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 01 May 2007 13:35:44 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l41DYltY032382; Tue, 1 May 2007 13:34:47 GMT Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org (170.Red-213-96-222.staticIP.rima-tde.net [213.96.222.170]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l41DWt3b030138 for ; Tue, 1 May 2007 13:32:55 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5C678D30C for ; Tue, 1 May 2007 15:04:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tungsteno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 03433-02 for ; Tue, 1 May 2007 15:04:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from snowflake (unknown [62.6.163.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7B1C8D305 for ; Tue, 1 May 2007 15:04:25 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 14:32:37 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] tests Message-ID: <20070501143237.482600be@snowflake> In-Reply-To: <1178025874.29859.74.camel@phoenix> References: <200705011508.57220.peper@gentoo.org> <1178025874.29859.74.camel@phoenix> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.1 (GTK+ 2.10.9; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Sig_xSuKZ8n6DH5qNtc5AUWBJ0Q; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at ferdyx.org X-Archives-Salt: 70d59cf1-c58d-4b57-8c99-ef8c778b362e X-Archives-Hash: 3e43a93acaee561d48ea1c8d62c57aaa --Sig_xSuKZ8n6DH5qNtc5AUWBJ0Q Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 01 May 2007 09:24:34 -0400 Josh Sled wrote: > On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 15:08 +0200, Piotr Jaroszy=C5=84ski wrote: > > Firstly each test can be(not all categories are mutually exclusive): > [...] > > - necessary >=20 > Could you qualify, please? Is this "necessary for the (non-test) > build artifact"? There are packages where upstream says that running 'make check' is an essential part of the build process, and that you shouldn't install without having done so. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_xSuKZ8n6DH5qNtc5AUWBJ0Q Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGN0F496zL6DUtXhERAkvSAKDjcgTJmWfXkaEMWh7nurUarwdy3QCdGLcA Ev27857ME3W2eVI6HM6lLGg= =Ytj3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_xSuKZ8n6DH5qNtc5AUWBJ0Q-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list