From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HiQLp-0000pf-Tl for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 07:31:14 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l3U7UHwi010288; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 07:30:17 GMT Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.174]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l3U7SNMU008004 for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 07:28:23 GMT Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id z38so1099327ugc for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 00:28:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=Usw89i5Yf6SoNAiDk1PgCOfpCnPdEJPH824EKHWey/52pwf/8SST/M9AETBuFv72af9cTiwCUYczAER2jRvfzPJ7SUbSQs7VZBbWHKcCw+LmPUfGG8k2V7+uy9PfCy1PBl4s+q+Nv2mNtNja+2g7PqA4qDQMnEX9qZSpVv2UYUU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=XP5MVyliv9wO6rIE0MC1wVIx9ycd1BHoeeBuQzq24CItFsGYjVo5EnTE0H/PXN+rXxqrETcKmiy1aRwKE02RST1A87v1ng9wxWqC/mt9JaDVwO4GQ8U0SzQD9d0hZaxeOgUlSlG/0bYSkUnhuNZJ4nxhC+5kcVzOc/4dIBvWpM0= Received: by 10.66.221.19 with SMTP id t19mr5212256ugg.1177918103204; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 00:28:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pender.cb.ac.at ( [193.170.53.9]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 24sm6182379ugf.2007.04.30.00.28.21; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 00:28:22 -0700 (PDT) From: Roman Zimmermann To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo: static/dynamic linking libraries Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 09:28:16 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <200704291032.06932.mereandor@gmail.com> <200704300507.10429.mereandor@gmail.com> <20070430053520.608278f5@sheridan.genone.homeip.net> In-Reply-To: <20070430053520.608278f5@sheridan.genone.homeip.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3523702.yyzapG0OuD"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200704300928.20427.mereandor@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: ed61faac-7581-4d90-90dd-6d827591fb55 X-Archives-Hash: 42a6e8a12a27ca6321c423cfde4a2966 --nextPart3523702.yyzapG0OuD Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Am Montag 30 April 2007 05:35 schrieb Marius Mauch: > [snip] > builds being irrelevant in many cases is wrong, just that the claim of > "only 2 packages needing it" is bogus. Surely this was meant in the context of the previous thread: 2 out of 845=20 packages on my system would be right. That's about 0,237%. Either way this = is=20 a small percentage to argue that 100% should be built with static libs. (And there is still the question whether those two would really _need_ thos= e=20 static libs or it's just due to the deficiency of the EXTRA_ECONF-method.) When I have time I will take a look on how some other distributions handle= =20 this. --nextPart3523702.yyzapG0OuD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBGNZqUIAIA2PPsul0RAtRkAJ9pkujhUPMU8zsWQ+MAsgwZuUlquQCfVKd3 cEh/G/Orp4vhIGayCPeCWXs= =cZLY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3523702.yyzapG0OuD-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list