From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HhOYT-00068r-8R for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 11:24:01 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l3RBNDCf030191; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 11:23:13 GMT Received: from mail.genone.homeip.net (dslb-082-083-062-110.pools.arcor-ip.net [82.83.62.110]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l3RBLHvV027917 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 11:21:18 GMT Received: by mail.genone.homeip.net (Postfix, from userid 460) id E22D8281C1; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:20:14 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8-gr0-genone_0.7 (2007-02-13) on lyta.genone.homeip.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=7.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.8-gr0-genone_0.7 Received: from unknown (unknown [192.168.0.40]) by mail.genone.homeip.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 7DAA0281BE for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:20:13 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:22:24 +0200 From: Marius Mauch To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Our profiles/updates handling is not smart enough Message-Id: <20070427132224.099518c3.genone@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4630F6C2.3050407@gentoo.org> References: <4630F6C2.3050407@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.7 (GTK+ 2.6.10; i686-pc-mingw32) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 86306653-7bf8-42c9-94aa-94208e097ebc X-Archives-Hash: 037325a6c6b3e2090fbc08bb1a51bf6d On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 22:00:18 +0300 Petteri R=E4ty wrote: > betelgeuse@pena ~ $ grep javahelp -r /usr/portage/profiles/updates/ > /usr/portage/profiles/updates/3Q-2004:move dev-java/javahelp > dev-java/javahelp-bin >=20 > Well nowadays Sun has put javahelp under GPL so now we have > dev-java/javahelp again. The problem is that Portage now uses this old > entry to rename the package back to javahelp-bin. >=20 > betelgeuse@pena ~ $ qfile /usr/bin/jhindexer > dev-java/javahelp-bin (/usr/bin/jhindexer) >=20 > So should we make it a policy to remove old entries after some time, or > make sure people check for old entries when adding new ones? I used to remove old "updates" files from time to time in the past, guess it's time to do it again. Marius -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list