From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HhI3B-0000Dm-1w for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 04:27:17 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l3R4QUxs004747; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 04:26:30 GMT Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org (pentafluge.infradead.org [213.146.154.40]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l3R4Obrh002355 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 04:24:37 GMT Received: from dsl093-040-174.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.93.40.174] helo=localhost) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.63 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1HhI0a-00038L-Jl for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 05:24:37 +0100 Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 21:16:26 -0700 From: Greg KH To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Linux 2.6.21 plans Message-ID: <20070427041626.GA4841@kroah.com> References: <46313C29.7050501@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06) X-Archives-Salt: d48362d4-48b0-499f-8d35-8977e6cc4780 X-Archives-Hash: 0842ae936c3b34ad19c6d55c683c6291 On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 03:33:59AM +0000, Duncan wrote: > Daniel Drake posted 46313C29.7050501@gentoo.org, > excerpted below, on Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:56:25 -0400: > > > This means that we may be pushing for 2.6.21 stable on x86 and amd64 on > > May 17th. If important issues come up (which they may well do), this > > will obviously be delayed, but do keep this date in mind. > > As I'm sure you are aware, there are more known regressions remaining > this time around. As with some others, I'm not all that confident this > kernel was ready for release just yet. Oh, well, I suppose there'll be a > 2.6.21.1 and etc... As no one was actually fixing any of the remaining bugs that were reported, what were the kernel developers supposed to do, just sit around and wait another week for no reason? Now we have more people testing :) And yes, this release might be a bit more unstable due to the large core changes, but in my testing, I have had no problems. thanks, greg k-h -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list