From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HhESd-00047i-Cv for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:37:19 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l3R0aYAk018906; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:36:34 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l3R0YddY016574 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:34:39 GMT Received: from phi.witten.lan (p83.129.4.196.tisdip.tiscali.de [83.129.4.196]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C91FD644BA; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:34:38 +0000 (UTC) From: Danny van Dyk Organization: Gentoo To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Planning for automatic assignment of bugs Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 02:33:50 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 Cc: "Robin H. Johnson" References: <20070426194006.GP7846@curie-int.orbis-terrarum.net> <1177631880.26557.4.camel@ulla> <20070427002406.GT7846@curie-int.orbis-terrarum.net> In-Reply-To: <20070427002406.GT7846@curie-int.orbis-terrarum.net> X-Face: =?utf-8?q?57Z3foFdBj=3BKdmU=5EFM=2Eec=5C4=7BQf/F6=25ePh=5C=5DM=5EaXPX*=5D?= =?utf-8?q?J5S=7CM=7E+vR=3F=24iW=5Cn44=5E2sguPTOtw=0A=09fe+7gKTm*!OXGQPYqML?= =?utf-8?q?=7CL1ezSI3-=27E=25zxZigvAK?=>3$?~'4IPBoi\H2)pV6U(26V@ =?utf-8?q?jq=7CAIp=0A=09yY?=>'!D}EOi=Q+-|CIh-d4riWfZZ">G.Rj!}78kX$8Zt0:epNWTo[{_/zJb< =?utf-8?q?Ud=2Eon=7EprEW*=0A=09tIvqI=7B+e=3AgMC?= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200704270233.51196.kugelfang@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: f24adc65-6c84-4dd1-8007-e9fa7a5a9592 X-Archives-Hash: def434479930b68f30d0d121aa7c704c Am Freitag, 27. April 2007 schrieb Robin H. Johnson: > On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 02:57:59AM +0300, Mart Raudsepp wrote: > > > This is exactly the reason that I proposed the contact=0 > > > attribute - for some of the packages that I maintain, I do not > > > want the bugs assigned directly to me, but to the herd instead. > > > While for others I _do_ want the duplicate. > > > > Could "contact" be named differently then? > > 'autocontact' then? > Both 'assign' and 'cc' (and derivations thereof are not suitable). notification=assignment|cc|none ? Danny -- Danny van Dyk Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list