From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1Hgl6T-00013Z-7v for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:16:29 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l3PHFI9x028896; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:15:18 GMT Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org (170.Red-213-96-222.staticIP.rima-tde.net [213.96.222.170]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l3PHBtkO023693 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:11:55 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A0608D315 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 18:51:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tungsteno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 15093-01 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 18:51:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from snowflake (unknown [62.6.163.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D9758D305 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 18:51:50 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 18:11:54 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [ANN] Multiple version suffixes illegal in gentoo-x86 Message-ID: <20070425181154.0ca4a077@snowflake> In-Reply-To: <462F8AAF.2090406@gentoo.org> References: <200704242111.44663.kugelfang@gentoo.org> <20070424193148.GO7810@curie-int.orbis-terrarum.net> <20070425085118.7d6948ba@snowflake> <200704250957.39745.kugelfang@gentoo.org> <20070425091759.256bc2a0@snowflake> <462F8AAF.2090406@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.1 (GTK+ 2.10.9; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Sig_wfH618mrm6Z6YWK+QGUq3O4; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at ferdyx.org X-Archives-Salt: 6795c9ae-d6dc-46f3-9e2e-c175bc2b1398 X-Archives-Hash: ab26cec9220e34eba29a830abf3db70c --Sig_wfH618mrm6Z6YWK+QGUq3O4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:06:55 -0700 Joshua Jackson wrote: > This is enough. PMS is a work in progress its not going to cover > everything that users and developers are going to be in some cases > boneheaded enough to actually pull off (always have edge conditions). No no, you miss the point. If developers are doing something, either PMS needs to allow it or they have to stop doing it. It's entirely relevant to the topic at hand. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_wfH618mrm6Z6YWK+QGUq3O4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGL4vc96zL6DUtXhERAgerAKCTmdOqht0LRVQ6xSdRQRC2ioClHwCg2J92 VipbUkGG7JJWuN9ak15gaNk= =pVlO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_wfH618mrm6Z6YWK+QGUq3O4-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list