From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HgdXF-0005hw-LM for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 09:11:38 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l3P9A1Hf022542; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 09:10:01 GMT Received: from mail.genone.homeip.net (dslc-082-082-163-098.pools.arcor-ip.net [82.82.163.98]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l3P97aBs019355 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 09:07:36 GMT Received: by mail.genone.homeip.net (Postfix, from userid 460) id 085F6281A8; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:06:43 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8-gr0-genone_0.7 (2007-02-13) on lyta.genone.homeip.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=7.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.8-gr0-genone_0.7 Received: from unknown (unknown [192.168.0.40]) by mail.genone.homeip.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 41DDF281A3 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:06:42 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:08:43 +0200 From: Marius Mauch To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [ANN] Multiple version suffixes illegal in gentoo-x86 Message-Id: <20070425110843.008971b5.genone@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <462EE75E.1000401@gentoo.org> References: <200704242111.44663.kugelfang@gentoo.org> <19541.166.70.55.210.1177442155.squirrel@wonkabar.org> <200704242154.20811.kugelfang@gentoo.org> <20070424210306.GP7810@curie-int.orbis-terrarum.net> <462E7953.9070403@gentoo.org> <462ED9CF.90909@gentoo.org> <462EE75E.1000401@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.7 (GTK+ 2.6.10; i686-pc-mingw32) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 4cab3a00-f6be-4292-b806-e2e698c5dd58 X-Archives-Hash: 4461ea20e03f730ee2f5c73efecc4238 On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 22:30:06 -0700 Alec Warner wrote: > Doug Goldstein wrote: > > I agree -r# is for ebuild changes not code changes. I remember a while > > back Portage would constantly use -r# instead of a 4th number and we > > worked at that to change that behavior since it was firmly established > > that -r# was for ebuild changes only. Not bumps in the code. > > > > Yeah stubbs loved that -rX :) Actually it was Nick, unfortunately the "tradition" was continued even after he left. Marius -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list