From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HgSq0-0007K0-FM for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:46:16 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l3OLi6kj022166; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:44:06 GMT Received: from mail.genone.homeip.net (dslc-082-082-163-098.pools.arcor-ip.net [82.82.163.98]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l3OLeMFJ016639 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:40:22 GMT Received: by mail.genone.homeip.net (Postfix, from userid 460) id F2E94281B2; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 23:39:32 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8-gr0-genone_0.7 (2007-02-13) on lyta.genone.homeip.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=7.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.8-gr0-genone_0.7 Received: from unknown (unknown [192.168.0.40]) by mail.genone.homeip.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 6E59A281A9 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 23:39:31 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 23:41:30 +0200 From: Marius Mauch To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [ANN] Multiple version suffixes illegal in gentoo-x86 Message-Id: <20070424234130.864ea26c.genone@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200704242320.05879.peper@gentoo.org> References: <200704242111.44663.kugelfang@gentoo.org> <200704242154.20811.kugelfang@gentoo.org> <462E6CC4.5000408@gentoo.org> <200704242320.05879.peper@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.7 (GTK+ 2.6.10; i686-pc-mingw32) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by robin.gentoo.org id l3OLi6mg022166 X-Archives-Salt: d376def4-8043-4357-b20d-7a89ff2389c7 X-Archives-Hash: 4486c6b32bab3341b1a82ed02a07aa98 On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 23:20:05 +0200 Piotr Jaroszy=C5=84ski wrote: > On Tuesday 24 of April 2007 22:47:00 Jurek Bartuszek wrote: > > Let me see if I have this straight: suppose we have package foo-0.1_r= c2 > > released (very outdated) and we're waiting for foo-0.1_rc3. Then exam= ple > > of something between those two would be foo-0.1_rc000220070313? Would > > that force portage to update to this version? Wouldn't that prevent > > portage from enforcing update to _rc3 when it's delivered? Of course = I > > might be wrong and if this is the case then excuse me for the whole f= uss ;) >=20 > foo-0.1_rc2 < foo-0.1_rc000220070313 < foo-0.1_rc3 Nope. The number part of suffixes is compared as integer. Marius --=20 gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list