From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HgSdJ-0005KA-DG for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:33:09 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l3OLVGGk002210; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:31:16 GMT Received: from mail.genone.homeip.net (dslc-082-082-163-098.pools.arcor-ip.net [82.82.163.98]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l3OLOAcr021634 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:24:10 GMT Received: by mail.genone.homeip.net (Postfix, from userid 460) id 9BF4A281B2; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 23:23:20 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8-gr0-genone_0.7 (2007-02-13) on lyta.genone.homeip.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=7.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.8-gr0-genone_0.7 Received: from unknown (unknown [192.168.0.40]) by mail.genone.homeip.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 4AC22281A9 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 23:23:19 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 23:25:18 +0200 From: Marius Mauch To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [ANN] Multiple version suffixes illegal in gentoo-x86 Message-Id: <20070424232518.f9d345f5.genone@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20070424195421.GB4929@ferdyx.org> References: <200704242111.44663.kugelfang@gentoo.org> <462E5796.8080707@gentoo.org> <20070424203751.0eae1394@maya> <462E5F58.3080402@gentoo.org> <20070424195421.GB4929@ferdyx.org> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.7 (GTK+ 2.6.10; i686-pc-mingw32) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 056239a9-d614-4a45-889f-5c14afa25816 X-Archives-Hash: 48d88bb5871c69678b0fc797c7f4bb4d On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:54:21 +0200 "Fernando J. Pereda" wrote: > You mean real Gentoo users that use a Portage version that don't support > multiple suffixes, right ? People still using portage 2.0.x have much more serious problems. Marius -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list