From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HgQeU-0005Nx-UQ for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 19:26:15 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l3OJPIHE026292; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 19:25:18 GMT Received: from ppsw-4.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-4.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.134]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l3OJNKMD023916 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 19:23:20 GMT X-Cam-SpamDetails: Not scanned X-Cam-AntiVirus: No virus found X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/ Received: from spb42.christs.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.233.172]:40595 helo=maya) by ppsw-4.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.154]:25) with esmtpsa (LOGIN:spb42) (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) id 1HgQbR-0000ZR-D1 (Exim 4.63) for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org (return-path ); Tue, 24 Apr 2007 20:23:05 +0100 Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 20:37:51 +0100 From: Stephen Bennett To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [ANN] Multiple version suffixes illegal in gentoo-x86 Message-ID: <20070424203751.0eae1394@maya> In-Reply-To: <462E5796.8080707@gentoo.org> References: <200704242111.44663.kugelfang@gentoo.org> <462E5796.8080707@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.7.2 (GTK+ 2.10.9; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "S.P. Bennett" X-Archives-Salt: 67a045f0-5ff2-42e6-bb7d-56dee9f7cd99 X-Archives-Hash: 3823563b07c81dac29b579a5e29fd6f3 On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:16:38 -0400 Doug Goldstein wrote: > So apparently as little as 1 council member can make a decision and it > be binding unless appealed to the entire council at the next meeting. There were three council members who happened to be around at the time, and those three agreed unanimously. That seems reasonable to me for an interim decision. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list