From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HgRCD-0000w8-9I for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 20:01:05 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l3OJwUL1030707; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 19:58:30 GMT Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org (170.Red-213-96-222.staticIP.rima-tde.net [213.96.222.170]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l3OJsTw2024371 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 19:54:29 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D7308D30C for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:35:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tungsteno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28726-05 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:35:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from posidon.ferdyx.org (posidon.ferdyx.org [192.168.0.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 981438D305 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:35:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: by posidon.ferdyx.org (nbSMTP-1.01-cvs) for uid 1000 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) ferdy@gentoo.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:54:22 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:54:21 +0200 From: "Fernando J. Pereda" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [ANN] Multiple version suffixes illegal in gentoo-x86 Message-ID: <20070424195421.GB4929@ferdyx.org> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <200704242111.44663.kugelfang@gentoo.org> <462E5796.8080707@gentoo.org> <20070424203751.0eae1394@maya> <462E5F58.3080402@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Y7xTucakfITjPcLV" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <462E5F58.3080402@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at ferdyx.org X-Archives-Salt: ed4d6524-c8ab-4ef1-8834-15fa5aa34cb1 X-Archives-Hash: 212244523df4e3094e5c4677e2920a99 --Y7xTucakfITjPcLV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 03:49:44PM -0400, Doug Goldstein wrote: > Stephen Bennett wrote: > > On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:16:38 -0400 > > Doug Goldstein wrote: > > > > =20 > >> So apparently as little as 1 council member can make a decision and it > >> be binding unless appealed to the entire council at the next meeting. > >> =20 > > > > There were three council members who happened to be around at the time, > > and those three agreed unanimously. That seems reasonable to me for an > > interim decision. > > =20 > Is it that serious of an issue that it needed to be done as such and > could not wait for a regular council meeting? >=20 > Granted I understand it's important for you paludis users since paludis > doesn't support that. > But I'm talking about real Gentoo users that use Portage. You mean real Gentoo users that use a Portage version that don't support multiple suffixes, right ? Oh... also... paludis supports it in trunk. Could you please stop the conspiracy theories ? - ferdy --=20 Fernando J. Pereda Garcimart=EDn 20BB BDC3 761A 4781 E6ED ED0B 0A48 5B0C 60BD 28D4 --Y7xTucakfITjPcLV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGLmBtCkhbDGC9KNQRAh8dAJ9MJ+WDkE4LBij937xDESYKC1e/cwCcCNnS CeVq542/XdWw76HiFUTR5Js= =5HhH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Y7xTucakfITjPcLV-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list