From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1Hep6f-0002vW-P3 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 20 Apr 2007 09:08:42 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l3K97l3R007357; Fri, 20 Apr 2007 09:07:47 GMT Received: from mo-p07-ob.rzone.de (mo-p07-ob.rzone.de [81.169.146.190]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l3K95vKb005125 for ; Fri, 20 Apr 2007 09:05:58 GMT Received: from luna.home (u-5-021.vpn.RWTH-Aachen.DE [137.226.101.21]) by post.webmailer.de (klopstock mo43) (RZmta 5.5) with ESMTP id D04000j3K6nTVL for ; Fri, 20 Apr 2007 11:05:56 +0200 (MEST) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 11:05:46 +0200 From: Christian Faulhammer To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: File collisions Message-ID: <20070420110546.76677c05@luna.home> In-Reply-To: References: <20070419140444.6b202c3b@luna.home> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.1 (GTK+ 2.10.9; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Sig_lLl6.ppfLA+Jl52S11wEzJy; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-RZG-AUTH: hXn+rC1arvT7Lf9I/zKDqjrgIkrokD1Qxy5bIqfbp9I10BMNL35Kum+fVbT8+ijLtsxAGXA72w== X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo07 X-Archives-Salt: 2079a39d-6b0c-4e27-a756-b050cb9da81d X-Archives-Hash: fcedbb56723558f06b373e5b6dcfbb08 --Sig_lLl6.ppfLA+Jl52S11wEzJy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable "Rob C" : > On 19/04/07, Christian Faulhammer wrote: > > Steve Long : > > > On the issue of QA, I think enabling FEATURES=3D"collision-detect" > > > by default would do a lot more good at this stage than "test". > > Arch teams normally have collision-protect enabled when doing > > keywording/stabling....in my eyes this is sufficient. > Its obviously not, Many users are reporting file-collisions on a > weekly basis. So either this isn't sufficient or the arch teams are > not acting as you describe. I can only speak for x86 team where it is mandatory for arch testers and devs. As far as I can tell other architecture teams handle it the same. Jakub already pointed out that many have very minimal chroots for stabling, while my chroot is cluttered with 1500 packages which should detect a lot of collisions. Just out of interest: How many file-collisions are filed per-week? V-Li --Sig_lLl6.ppfLA+Jl52S11wEzJy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGKIJzNQqtfCuFneMRAvd7AJ4peI3ST1xy86so4wdGVqBhRK/WxgCgj7PV oEQ3XBox6TB3xK6HnTLUOjc= =ax06 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_lLl6.ppfLA+Jl52S11wEzJy-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list