[gentoo-dev] Re: File collisions

[Christian Faulhammer <opfer@gentoo.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 979 bytes --]

"Rob C" <hyakuhei@gentoo.org>:

> On 19/04/07, Christian Faulhammer <opfer@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > Steve Long <slong@rathaus.eclipse.co.uk>:
> > > On the issue of QA, I think enabling FEATURES="collision-detect"
> > > by default would do a lot more good at this stage than "test".
> > Arch teams normally have collision-protect enabled when doing
> > keywording/stabling....in my eyes this is sufficient.
> Its obviously not, Many users are reporting file-collisions on a
> weekly basis. So either this isn't sufficient or the arch teams are
> not acting as you describe.

 I can only speak for x86 team where it is mandatory for arch testers
and devs.  As far as I can tell other architecture teams handle it the
same.  Jakub already pointed out that many have very minimal chroots
for stabling, while my chroot is cluttered with 1500 packages which
should detect a lot of collisions.
 Just out of interest: How many file-collisions are filed per-week?

V-Li

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]