From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HeASD-0000R0-GY for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 18 Apr 2007 13:44:14 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l3IDgmjZ012835; Wed, 18 Apr 2007 13:42:48 GMT Received: from misav10.sasknet.sk.ca (misav10.sasknet.sk.ca [142.165.20.174]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l3IDdUQQ007846 for ; Wed, 18 Apr 2007 13:39:31 GMT Received: from bgmpomr1.sasknet.sk.ca ([142.165.72.22]) by misav10 with InterScan Messaging Security Suite; Wed, 18 Apr 2007 07:39:28 -0600 Received: from altair.jimramsay.com ([207.47.217.211]) by bgmpomr1.sasknet.sk.ca (SaskTel eMessaging Service) with ESMTPSA id <0JGP00KVL4LS0L50@bgmpomr1.sasknet.sk.ca> for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 18 Apr 2007 07:39:28 -0600 (CST) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 07:39:22 -0600 From: Jim Ramsay Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] [POLICY] Keywording/Stabilizing Bug Assignment Policy In-reply-to: <46254BFB.5070402@gentoo.org> To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Message-id: <20070418073922.056961d7@altair.jimramsay.com> Organization: Gentoo Linux Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.8.1 (GTK+ 2.10.11; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Content-type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_NHldNj_al/w6CdfRG7w8bYE"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 References: <4625187A.4060403@gentoo.org> <46254BFB.5070402@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 618272c3-f448-4a01-b5e4-00de80afd195 X-Archives-Hash: 5002e847c9486b20305f074819aca182 --Sig_NHldNj_al/w6CdfRG7w8bYE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Vlastimil Babka wrote: > Or maybe implement new bugzilla keywords, like STABLEREQ and > KEYWORDREQ which would be added to the respective bugs. Then you (the > maintainer) can easily create (and save) an advanced search that will > filter them out, while still being able to check them in a different > search. Might be also useful for arch teams to separate stabling and > keywording bugs? I think that's a great idea. Who do we bug to get this in there? --=20 Jim Ramsay Gentoo/Linux Developer (rox,gkrellm) --Sig_NHldNj_al/w6CdfRG7w8bYE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGJh+PelWXok6VKugRAggsAJ4uieXZRLTodQgTRchSexLTgJZOHwCgyFZd k1/17Qe40u+Aa7sJymh5eMA= =Yg0V -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_NHldNj_al/w6CdfRG7w8bYE-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list