From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HdvVd-0008LZ-B2 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 17 Apr 2007 21:46:45 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l3HLjhtM031916; Tue, 17 Apr 2007 21:45:43 GMT Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org (170.Red-213-96-222.staticIP.rima-tde.net [213.96.222.170]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l3HLhccv029541 for ; Tue, 17 Apr 2007 21:43:39 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80A108D315 for ; Tue, 17 Apr 2007 23:34:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tungsteno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 14973-04 for ; Tue, 17 Apr 2007 23:34:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from snowflake (unknown [62.6.163.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 366178D305 for ; Tue, 17 Apr 2007 23:34:48 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 22:44:09 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] FYI: Jakub suspended two weeks for bad behaviour Message-ID: <20070417224409.79cdf75e@snowflake> In-Reply-To: <9fce88250704171419l2c0511a4gdf7df236c11e274c@mail.gmail.com> References: <20070416230204.GW10368@woodpecker.gentoo.org> <4624E926.8060700@gentoo.org> <462511DA.1040902@gentoo.org> <20070417184941.GJ10368@woodpecker.gentoo.org> <462519C8.3030603@gentoo.org> <20070417190918.GK10368@woodpecker.gentoo.org> <9fce88250704171419l2c0511a4gdf7df236c11e274c@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.8.1 (GTK+ 2.10.9; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Sig_gmcrlmIWH.Fv+beW5FJBfI2; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at ferdyx.org X-Archives-Salt: a9f8cb54-be61-41c7-8404-1fe5c45dbe7f X-Archives-Hash: 84d3cfd7ac0bf76490eeff1eaca5bb85 --Sig_gmcrlmIWH.Fv+beW5FJBfI2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 17 Apr 2007 23:19:14 +0200 "Jakub Moc" wrote: > Sorry, you've miserably failed, you should have retired this guy long > time ago before things went this far, since he obviously doesn't care > about Gentoo users, but just about his territorial pissings. Instead, > you've chosen to jump on me for doing my job. Oh well done indeed. I believe your job was to assist developers, not to make things harder for them. Meddling with correctly assigned bugs just to generate bugspam for people you don't like falls into the latter category. > Maybe just read above? What kind of co-operation are you expecting wrt > developers who have repeatedly shown that they can't plain be bothered > with fixing their junk, because they are just way too cool to deal > with some useless idiots, such as bug wranglers? It's good that you've seen straight to the core of the issue. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_gmcrlmIWH.Fv+beW5FJBfI2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGJT+r96zL6DUtXhERAopYAKCc1MeaJtGjVuDx0SB8UV5gM4sk5QCguEmB 3J5WqO7/XvsA2HmmOUlV86Y= =4Xa4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_gmcrlmIWH.Fv+beW5FJBfI2-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list