From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HcRou-00054w-9w for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 19:52:32 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l3DJob69003229; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 19:50:37 GMT Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org (170.Red-213-96-222.staticIP.rima-tde.net [213.96.222.170]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l3DJknME029331 for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 19:46:49 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1608E8D315 for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 21:44:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tungsteno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 23423-09 for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 21:43:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from snowflake (unknown [62.6.163.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14C4A8D305 for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 21:43:57 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 20:46:47 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI 1 (Was: Re: Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for April) Message-ID: <20070413204647.2f3bf04a@snowflake> In-Reply-To: <461FDA19.2040408@gentoo.org> References: <20070401092940.1B4C26441E@smtp.gentoo.org> <200704131053.39321.vapier@gentoo.org> <20070413162514.75393d90@snowflake> <200704131152.17004.vapier@gentoo.org> <20070413174251.6e46a67e@snowflake> <461FC8EE.8090904@gentoo.org> <20070413193605.709a99a3@snowflake> <461FDA19.2040408@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.8.1 (GTK+ 2.10.9; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_j6qgYq1eksoBrCK=fEDtYYp"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at ferdyx.org X-Archives-Salt: 5736ed58-c92d-46b5-9846-5c6b07d4410a X-Archives-Hash: 7ebaf5e20aa47d53d52ffae3d815534f --Sig_j6qgYq1eksoBrCK=fEDtYYp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 21:29:29 +0200 Luca Barbato wrote: > Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > If a test suite isn't viable, the ebuild should be RESTRICTing test > > anyway. >=20 > That means ALL the media applications, almost all the toolchain > applications, most languages and a couple of other items I don't > touch. What, you're saying they all ship with test suites that exist but don't work? > I don't think it shoud be part of the spec even if you don't have test > broken on delivery. src_test is already part of the spec, and ebuilds are supposed to either support it or RESTRICT it. I'm just proposing that EAPI 1 be a lot stricter about it... --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_j6qgYq1eksoBrCK=fEDtYYp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGH94p96zL6DUtXhERAvFVAKCmHZE2WoblW1xP+uzkh7yzD/5eeQCg1fzJ GK+Bo9uB5C0ruvd1qnIXSFw= =36XZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_j6qgYq1eksoBrCK=fEDtYYp-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list