From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HcPP9-0005du-OO for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 17:17:48 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l3DHFO6o010563; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 17:15:24 GMT Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org (170.Red-213-96-222.staticIP.rima-tde.net [213.96.222.170]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l3DHBtuW005747 for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 17:11:55 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D7628D314 for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 19:09:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tungsteno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22800-02 for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 19:09:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from snowflake (unknown [62.6.163.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCF8B8D305 for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 19:09:12 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 18:11:54 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: April Council meeting summary Message-ID: <20070413181154.118e1452@snowflake> In-Reply-To: References: <200704121845.13563.vapier@gentoo.org> <20070413162734.2617f04d@snowflake> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.8.1 (GTK+ 2.10.9; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_6D88eBvn/RiC6ba1xoPvgLn"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at ferdyx.org X-Archives-Salt: 485c3d13-21c2-4e63-9203-9f8ca58eacc4 X-Archives-Hash: 52f596ae0008e76a4cf03dd67c899d55 --Sig_6D88eBvn/RiC6ba1xoPvgLn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 17:58:52 +0100 Steve Long wrote: > Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > Mike Frysinger wrote: > >> PMS: > >> - should be up and running on Gentoo infra by next meeting > >=20 > > What is the justification for making this change? It's already > > inconvenient enough having to have someone else make bugzilla > > changes for me on PMS bugs that I didn't submit; what reason is > > there for extending this annoyance to the source too? > >=20 > [16:47] vapier: it is already a QA subproject >=20 > It's not such a big deal in practise is it? Yes, it is. It's a change in workflow, and it at least doubles the amount of work for each commit. > Unless you're saying you can't use git? Which would be decidedly > strange for a kernel contributor.. I'm saying I don't see any point in it when svn is doing the job just fine now. If someone can provide a good reason for changing to a system that's more work, I'll change. If there isn't a good reason, I won't. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_6D88eBvn/RiC6ba1xoPvgLn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGH7nc96zL6DUtXhERAjsoAJ9k9itsbbDBSqSyvkFEkZL/XcxQ+ACfeTmn GGseljbGLxvDs1Kuk8Us/FU= =aB5G -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_6D88eBvn/RiC6ba1xoPvgLn-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list