Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: April Council meeting summary

[Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@ciaranm.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1078 bytes --]

On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 17:58:52 +0100
Steve Long <slong@rathaus.eclipse.co.uk> wrote:
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:
> >> PMS:
> >> - should be up and running on Gentoo infra by next meeting
> > 
> > What is the justification for making this change? It's already
> > inconvenient enough having to have someone else make bugzilla
> > changes for me on PMS bugs that I didn't submit; what reason is
> > there for extending this annoyance to the source too?
> > 
> [16:47] <Kugelfang> vapier: it is already a QA subproject
> 
> It's not such a big deal in practise is it?

Yes, it is. It's a change in workflow, and it at least doubles the
amount of work for each commit.

> Unless you're saying you can't use git? Which would be decidedly
> strange for a kernel contributor..

I'm saying I don't see any point in it when svn is doing the job just
fine now.

If someone can provide a good reason for changing to a system that's
more work, I'll change. If there isn't a good reason, I won't.

-- 
Ciaran McCreesh


[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]