From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HcNkI-00011N-0R for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 15:31:30 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l3DFT6bP001723; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 15:29:06 GMT Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org (170.Red-213-96-222.staticIP.rima-tde.net [213.96.222.170]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l3DFP8sL028379 for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 15:25:09 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 310D18D33E for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 17:22:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tungsteno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09392-10 for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 17:22:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from snowflake (unknown [62.6.163.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7C948D304 for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 17:22:28 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 16:24:57 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: EAPI 1 (Was: Re: Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for April) Message-ID: <20070413162457.77d8b26c@snowflake> In-Reply-To: <200704131111.07737.vapier@gentoo.org> References: <20070401092940.1B4C26441E@smtp.gentoo.org> <20070413155032.54edddc0@snowflake> <200704131111.07737.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.8.1 (GTK+ 2.10.9; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Sig_wbi6FoFcqFLQLRJDke0JtKu; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at ferdyx.org X-Archives-Salt: 99a54bfa-5980-4c1d-986e-41d707b03269 X-Archives-Hash: 5ddff38e5c619d1b1e62c337e0c95a1f --Sig_wbi6FoFcqFLQLRJDke0JtKu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 11:11:07 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: > > Except there are. Hence why we want EAPI 1 in the short term, not > > several years from now. The stuff that will take longer can go into > > a later EAPI. >=20 > this is really up to the portage team to drive If they instead decide that EAPI 1 is a long term goal, will the Council intervene? --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_wbi6FoFcqFLQLRJDke0JtKu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGH6DP96zL6DUtXhERAiPVAJ99uvIgmFf44TLlJSKteCfB/XPaTQCffcPV LDx4X75B6fNd9RrAyFQkc9Y= =9YtE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_wbi6FoFcqFLQLRJDke0JtKu-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list