From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HcNBh-0006ho-1e for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 14:55:45 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l3DEs7nv018019; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 14:54:07 GMT Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org (170.Red-213-96-222.staticIP.rima-tde.net [213.96.222.170]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l3DEoZ0l012611 for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 14:50:35 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BEF88D33E for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 16:48:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tungsteno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09392-06 for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 16:48:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from snowflake (unknown [62.6.163.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D9698D304 for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 16:47:59 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 15:50:32 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: EAPI 1 (Was: Re: Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for April) Message-ID: <20070413155032.54edddc0@snowflake> In-Reply-To: References: <20070401092940.1B4C26441E@smtp.gentoo.org> <200704052240.56083.kugelfang@gentoo.org> <20070405212406.GA13118@seldon> <200704060016.18194.kugelfang@gentoo.org> <20070405221147.GB13118@seldon> <20070411154101.79634783@snowflake> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.8.1 (GTK+ 2.10.9; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_jfZWAcvZJWdae=Bzjuke9v6"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at ferdyx.org X-Archives-Salt: bea0596b-8ea0-4621-880e-7bcb642f10ad X-Archives-Hash: 400f102b0af04c54b16e45289fc15565 --Sig_jfZWAcvZJWdae=Bzjuke9v6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 15:24:25 +0100 Steve Long wrote: > Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > Brian Harring wrote: > >> Either way, EAPI=3D1 *should* have a bit more then just slot deps in > >> my opinion; very least it needs discussion to discern what folks > >> want. > >=20 > > Well, EAPI 1 needs to be delivered quickly... >=20 > Why exactly does EAPI=3D1 need to be rushed? Because the tree needed the functionality in question several years ago. > I thought the whole point of 0 was allowing a base, so that new stuff > could be developed while guaranteeing certain behaviour. What's the > hurry? It's not like there are systems b0rking or anything because > EAPI=3D1 isn't around; Except there are. Hence why we want EAPI 1 in the short term, not several years from now. The stuff that will take longer can go into a later EAPI. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_jfZWAcvZJWdae=Bzjuke9v6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGH5i696zL6DUtXhERAoR/AKCY9e9B1OIUW6IBvXaLMEU/RPPouQCgoTRI jSbrT2jnLqfMX+ArXupruZ8= =owX4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_jfZWAcvZJWdae=Bzjuke9v6-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list