From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HcPsJ-0002CJ-Ni for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 17:47:56 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l3DHiQZi031333; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 17:44:26 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l3DHd7aC020506 for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 17:39:08 GMT Received: from ip6-localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4970A650F1 for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 17:05:29 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] baselayout-2 and volumes (raid, lvm, crypt, etc) Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 13:06:14 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <20070413124143.629296ec@uberlaptop.development.ltl> <1176483411.8883.20.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> In-Reply-To: <1176483411.8883.20.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3068354.tJvfGbxcyO"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200704131306.14763.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 2b0225b9-f1ca-4641-bef1-a72f3504d472 X-Archives-Hash: 7b30bba153a7b3bc9e11579b020d6d40 --nextPart3068354.tJvfGbxcyO Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 13 April 2007, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 11:23 -0500, Alex Tarkovsky wrote: > > It's mid-April and 2007.0 is still nowhere in sight, so the idea that > > there will be a 2007.1 is looking increasingly unrealistic. Please > > don't make baselayout-2's unmasking contingent on that. > > I guess I should just delete all this 2007.0 media we've been working on > then, huh? > > I'm simply amazed at the level of complete and total bullshit that some > people spout off on this list without bothering to check facts or take 3 > seconds to talk to the people in the know. If you don't know what > you're talking about, rather than open your mouth and prove to everyone > that you are clueless about the particular topic, it's probably best to > either ask someone or talk about something you're actually familiar > with, instead. For those of you wondering, 2007.0 is close to being > finished. You can blame the abnormally high number of security > vulnerabilities in large packages for the delays. Also, the dates given > on the Release Engineering pages are nothing more than guesses made by > me months before we even start the release. They are in no way binding. so full of hate ! -mike --nextPart3068354.tJvfGbxcyO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUARh+4hkFjO5/oN/WBAQKNwhAApw1zJv7NEke2uocZ+uiupjbiqh+Rd22o /fI8XJ3MqsKWGYdulXCCEFs91+SDRcjAgragA1FGpH6vpjTZsWz9u2n3s5vgO2Z2 VtLNceSL1f38cSWPWEnpqk7r+ql/V4v14OLRisEna9Ihl2keX8gASdHvLzJNs7Mt Qz8vMCpqL0LSxkimwG/Q+CKqpeXUbFoUtgaxw+e2KHYi2lQgpcfovJG9i4tyyu3p fGrXQD4ZmQdc/kKngSV1/s0WVMOetZjvvadUiGKq/e5KIx1oRDReovmefCxfV8lD b64mPsZg5qSAiDdDb34s1nRIcSuq+psV/IHhV9650wEC0uvwCZTLz5ruWUGyFV6u f/mW/t6+J3JZaMlt0u12ZBAYVTFpGA433AqKKYxQo+ZhPF97th6uvnTml1aGeGtr zUSBAIvonZI/ghgui2eKJgtsGgBgmpz+Vgq3wpjUnoOVD5dQvZUj6WqUgB1WgjwB IrEmYwzmHJZMfXamscJnWqcARMXBsJFu2Qrhk/2hfcab0e5LtdRBWQoX3BuF9Ktt 5boMbKiqWPQHFvyju6b9viwxFpL4JeRvcu2XpODacd973DCz7LGAwhjXT4x5NPbt 8XO+StpWcg5SxP0KkLZPnf3riqlx0DYwP6ztvTBXPTPz5qVNtkp6QW+4+8RywT34 UYdhCewXkKk= =9DWl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3068354.tJvfGbxcyO-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list