From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HcLmw-0001S5-SP for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 13:26:07 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l3DDOmAL008866; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 13:24:48 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l3DDMoCg006497 for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 13:22:51 GMT Received: from ip6-localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D66D0642BA; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 13:22:49 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] baselayout-2 and volumes (raid, lvm, crypt, etc) Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 09:23:32 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 Cc: "Benjamin Smee (strerror)" , Roy Marples References: <20070413124143.629296ec@uberlaptop.development.ltl> <200704131355.41546.strerror@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200704131355.41546.strerror@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1655667.JmuruVtrWy"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200704130923.33246.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 69ffb525-1f43-489f-b980-16b662af626d X-Archives-Hash: ca24132fd6fb6402750fcc7e42957ca9 --nextPart1655667.JmuruVtrWy Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 13 April 2007, Benjamin Smee (strerror) wrote: > On Friday 13 April 2007 12:41:43 Roy Marples wrote: > > If you care about such things, then you need to pester the maintainer > > of said package to write an init script for it that has the following > > dependency > > I'll look into it, any idea when you are going to making baselayout-2 > stable so I have an ETA on when this has to be done by? Anyone that has > time and wants to submit some patches (I don't think that there is too > much that is bash specific in it off the top of my head) to test, simply > bug it to me. ha, it wont even be leaving package.mask soonish, so i doubt you have any=20 stable worries i wonder how hard we want to ride this though ... target 2007.1 ? =2Dmike --nextPart1655667.JmuruVtrWy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUARh+EVUFjO5/oN/WBAQJmmw/+PxVBXresfZvMJ7eyJ519C72wVN19oJra i+rxhYYPt9mbpJKGObatjAb8jHrBExVDrtLln9uon2gVpMwv5jf8FtTmm9iJX+LH owe8jhU2H+MhQPzUs+Pvw6z+uGJ7ne9Um85yp35FRPM8PbEQFYMVHJtkpnvGmAuX lqmKHR8KAsREgkWUtF+PvhoxvdD7GaUse15aaAo+45BAEj8jN32AjHm7Xifq1ab8 UZwu55QYC+Z3L25K+T49rnQPRxguitZ130G2N1O76f1XLNMgdWwWDejo0sOxS0NQ nHNUj+MOG7OHEvuH74QVSDmDpfgnh/7p5LmxwuWdw0sP/BqRwtUC0e7DRtif7mMp 1fPAoi3Z/yA1z1wMOp1InaUXOpIPhNHztoJwv/SEnm9UAhW5ZoDjmbN1rt/IJmce NhijhXdL4LXQj066ROqKNqiSGvOTw2oY/TGZYYLJ/k08ktaIcstseHFG/MFLKgnb zgOlLmH8BZneziBHF0DCBDpogSFsd6GWF6C97XQ2rbo3bK4TtkWLGGHBB8smIVYA rVs79vGAHli1aCF5QmXvsE6B7eCBvqZG+9hdJDobjZa6JPtx5xChxiN7Jfw5gwIW dYwxHZSLsZ+p44lXmUfWQH2kOV0xOSjMxnTks8OXqztDXVwggSQnUFTkYhw87Uun ZZouJTjYuDs= =cTZb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1655667.JmuruVtrWy-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list