From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HcLAl-0007zy-5S for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 12:46:39 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l3DCj4w3015189; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 12:45:04 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l3DCdsAJ006258 for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 12:39:54 GMT Received: from ip6-localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46F5F6531A for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 12:32:16 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI 1 (Was: Re: Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for April) Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 08:33:00 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <20070401092940.1B4C26441E@smtp.gentoo.org> <20070411154101.79634783@snowflake> <20070413142116.d6d00c8b.genone@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20070413142116.d6d00c8b.genone@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1979889.88OjC78EHZ"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200704130833.00741.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: df606253-064d-4d8f-93c4-274e510a2edd X-Archives-Hash: fdaf11ec03e92d9605133ee5c4a9a88b --nextPart1979889.88OjC78EHZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 13 April 2007, Marius Mauch wrote: > Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > * src_test always called except if RESTRICT=3Dtest > > I don't think this would fit into EAPI, to me it's an implementation > detail of the package manager, or why should the ebuild care about it? hmm, i'd have to agree ... this is something that could be done easily via = the=20 profile in EAPI-0 now ... requiring package managers to behave this way=20 doesnt really gain anything =2Dmike --nextPart1979889.88OjC78EHZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUARh94fEFjO5/oN/WBAQL5xQ/8DC6hvTwyli2wwOVlo5Yb9Mqf0r8pbDeE 22t5y+AQKmz34AIAa7kygqSZTVBUcqb8FgW6Krlnao+S8Id4z2jVNg9/Wg+s6uxd +GMU3jgRq5HseOwafaXuuixuLE1eqRKaxlzd/OuQBUxHiM27AArfErIWgU0xd3ve EQCMKT0pE1qoganwH4l1RAmwIepU3ls02DHaP3tCCTZn3q+c7Dyd7AE2+jELY8h7 ie0+PExaR2wif3Jo+P4is83NNCvnDLFT8eo5dARcJXj5M1e3SJ6Vm0Db/cEK4rJb vonJZZpYnDOEKYb8dWBaEAKTB280iUxUOzqMvQay4Uu1vz8+dsHMcktowwgDbZLA fqhoOLlYZRnu6UC5x0FvH4pIfehB4BWheubFQSoEvLeMFw9vZthl501E0fcUtb7l gNjWOaRUonH68k1mfzWLFmvXF27R0rsvlnYiBj/WmiLjHm3/kog4uuSLmPNEnO4Q EBfl7XpCNMa7Ot0lw5jOWpSFnnP09l/erAOLTb7kbQ8Tu9zyY1DmmAj8FEZo9S2N v5gblpz8OTmpGXplwqHWfVyLFF2hpJSgN0EOn6IQ7HIhpT1J9ELa4Mrt0nQBH8oN WYsjqa6bVaL0zkkr37zPeU5t+M65GAuDUE14PnFJfpBsgPXkKuAh+Wlz/qVJfItP 8QlXm0SKs4w= =wp3P -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1979889.88OjC78EHZ-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list