From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1Hc1pZ-0008M6-RM for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 12 Apr 2007 16:07:30 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l3CG6QwZ028333; Thu, 12 Apr 2007 16:06:26 GMT Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org (170.Red-213-96-222.staticIP.rima-tde.net [213.96.222.170]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l3CG4Mf0025999 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2007 16:04:22 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6426D8D316 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2007 18:03:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tungsteno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 23278-04 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2007 18:03:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from snowflake (unknown [62.6.163.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80C498D304 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2007 18:03:10 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 17:04:08 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for April Message-ID: <20070412170408.1758d598@snowflake> In-Reply-To: <20070412095423.50e07022@sed-192.sedsystems.ca> References: <20070401092940.1B4C26441E@smtp.gentoo.org> <200704051520.13827.vapier@gentoo.org> <1175807920.6548.26.camel@onyx.private.gni.com> <20070412164748.TA88c9d.tv@veller.net> <20070412095423.50e07022@sed-192.sedsystems.ca> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.8.1 (GTK+ 2.10.9; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Sig_4p542qsKOMSsG83rttp9c4_; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at ferdyx.org X-Archives-Salt: 9b2543e6-34c0-407c-bd7c-6fb76ad3e43b X-Archives-Hash: 83e31049bfe0810280c2fe2205b5fe3f --Sig_4p542qsKOMSsG83rttp9c4_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 09:54:23 -0600 Jim Ramsay wrote: > I personally prefer the first option here, but others think full > public transparency would be nice, and after ${time_period} most of > the info on -core isn't nearly as 'sensitive' as it is when first > posted. If something's supposed to be transparent, it shouldn't be on -core. And, conversely, if something's on -core, it's not supposed to be transparent. Opening up -core just makes it harder to handle those rare cases where things really are required to be restricted. There's also the issue of whether this can legitimately be made retroactive. As Ned already pointed out, some developers only posted things to -core because they believed that it was not public. Instead, why not look into reducing the amount of traffic on -core? --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_4p542qsKOMSsG83rttp9c4_ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGHlh896zL6DUtXhERAs5KAJ9q90LppRZ/lFsWbhUcEl9WxzyqZQCcDdwB ArRPPlwM3GU3eZdQDfOCGdM= =MXZp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_4p542qsKOMSsG83rttp9c4_-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list