From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-22528-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>) id 1Hbg3a-0008Gb-2T for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 16:52:30 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l3BGoBkJ003443; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 16:50:11 GMT Received: from mail.genone.homeip.net (dslc-082-082-161-040.pools.arcor-ip.net [82.82.161.40]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l3BGjU9Y028598 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 16:45:30 GMT Received: by mail.genone.homeip.net (Postfix, from userid 460) id 889A628045; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 18:45:29 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8-gr0-genone_0.7 (2007-02-13) on lyta.genone.homeip.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=7.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.8-gr0-genone_0.7 Received: from unknown (unknown [192.168.0.40]) by mail.genone.homeip.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 06DA028045 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 18:45:28 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 18:46:40 +0200 From: Marius Mauch <genone@gentoo.org> To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New metastructure proposal Message-Id: <20070411184640.adc99efb.genone@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <1176304865.8755.66.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> References: <20070410193249.GD7991@ubik> <20070411005935.f3adf691.genone@gentoo.org> <1176304865.8755.66.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.7 (GTK+ 2.6.10; i686-pc-mingw32) Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: c9eb3e79-ebfa-4de9-915b-5c3160bf11f5 X-Archives-Hash: 7c30d10ab1187fdc8ff4c25b91c19b99 On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 11:21:05 -0400 Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 00:59 +0200, Marius Mauch wrote: > > I like the part about projects being self-organizing, but splitting up the tree is a no go from my POV. > > Are they not already? Mostly yes. > Aside from the global requirements on what it takes to be a developer, > projects are able to recruit anyone that they want. Still needs coordination with recruiters/infra to get all the right permissions and stuff setup. For example, ideally there shouldn't be a need for a project lead to bug someone from recruiters/infra to givea dev access to his projects resources (if they are restricted). Note that it's just a _very minor_ annoyance, the current system is generally good enough. Another idea would be to change the staffing needs page from push to pull (similar to the projects index.xml page) so projects could publish their needs without having to redirect it by recruiters (again, minor issue). Marius -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list