From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-22534-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
	id 1Hbgqm-0000wg-Fn
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 17:43:20 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l3BHgO3q001633;
	Wed, 11 Apr 2007 17:42:24 GMT
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l3BHeX3Q031848
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 17:40:33 GMT
Received: from ip6-localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39E2964262
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 17:40:32 +0000 (UTC)
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
Organization: wh0rd.org
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New metastructure proposal
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 13:41:07 -0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6
References: <20070410193249.GD7991@ubik> <20070411174514.65865494@snowflake> <1176311939.8755.102.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org>
In-Reply-To: <1176311939.8755.102.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  boundary="nextPart1947277.Qm2STygAzm";
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200704111341.08408.vapier@gentoo.org>
X-Archives-Salt: 63450057-8eeb-4026-a4b9-4ae603c40732
X-Archives-Hash: 312495b608f5de77b203889c6a38a740

--nextPart1947277.Qm2STygAzm
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-6"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Wednesday 11 April 2007, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> Personally, I'd prefer we fix the stuff and simply inform the
> maintainers, rather than force them to have to do the work as some form
> of punishment for not following policy close enough.  ;]

i drop notes to gentoo-dev when doing mass changes like the doenvd stuff ..=
=2E i=20
used to e-mail individual maintainers, but writing so many e-mails sucked u=
p=20
time real fast
=2Dmike

--nextPart1947277.Qm2STygAzm
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (GNU/Linux)
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=+Cwg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1947277.Qm2STygAzm--
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list