From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HbOdf-0000XO-2a for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2007 22:16:35 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l3AMEwsp022212; Tue, 10 Apr 2007 22:15:00 GMT Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.186]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l3AMARfG014759 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2007 22:10:27 GMT Received: from [82.82.190.70] (helo=unknown) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu5) with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0ML25U-1HbOXh1l0Y-0007YL; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 00:10:26 +0200 Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 00:08:29 +0200 From: Marius Mauch To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: extending project xml to have stuff that the project is working on and collect them as Gentoo current goals Message-Id: <20070411000829.efb44c29.genone@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <461BF4D1.6090204@gentoo.org> References: <461BF4D1.6090204@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.10 (GTK+ 2.6.10; i686-pc-mingw32) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18brAs4EG1MEYVkjkEaDzTvpa3vxBreoA88V7M 1k7UJo3zTG2L8yAWB1goxXAGlnaOLNWpS+WZ3Tfk8alNd3hn8C H8fkTdPzOdas8JeuXUASQ== X-Archives-Salt: 8775cca5-3ed5-4255-93ba-526d39cabfa4 X-Archives-Hash: 747a7ff7e8cba2d8a198f50e3a34f48a On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 23:34:25 +0300 Petteri R=E4ty wrote: > As the recent thread showed there is a lot going on in Gentoo land > although it doesn't always seem so. I propose we extend project xml to > describe current stuff going on in the project in question and their > estimated completion date. Then we require this file to be updated > monthly. What do you think? Assuming we'd go with this, what would happen if a project doesn't update i= t's file? Realistic answer: nothing. So any such requirement is just a recommendation= anyway. Besides there already is the tag that can be used for that (though t= he layout is extremely crappy). Counter proposal: Extend planet.g.o with project feeds, e.g. planet.g.o/pro= jects/foo collecting news from all members of project foo (identified by ca= tegory or so). That's where most people are posting/looking for news anyway= these days. Marius -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list