From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HbGp4-0006oE-LV for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2007 13:55:51 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l3ADsHfI013010; Tue, 10 Apr 2007 13:54:17 GMT Received: from kerberos.ynet.sk (proxy.ynet.sk [147.175.189.193]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l3ADpIbP009116 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2007 13:51:18 GMT Received: from daria.ynet.sk (daria.ynet.sk [147.175.178.246]) by kerberos.ynet.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 652D036C01D for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2007 15:51:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from thelair.ticho.local (vthelair [192.168.111.2]) by daria.ynet.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BE581CE25F for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2007 15:51:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thelair.ticho.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A75B4CA14E for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2007 14:59:07 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 14:59:05 +0200 From: Andrej Kacian To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] genlop-0.30.6 released Message-ID: <20070410145905.4f44a4ef@localhost> In-Reply-To: <461B8304.90408@gentoo.org> References: <20070408150352.GA2652@paradox.datanode.net> <461B8304.90408@gentoo.org> Organization: chaotic at best... X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.8.1cvs51 (GTK+ 2.10.11; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Sig_8iZOTntncOFq4MZj0BH9EiZ; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: f4b69398-5908-4919-b2d7-5b749397a2ad X-Archives-Hash: 310725c8652e4ce73ae9d2a7647e7ac5 --Sig_8iZOTntncOFq4MZj0BH9EiZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 14:28:52 +0200 Timothy Redaelli wrote: > Imho is a waste of time to maintain two projects which does the same > things (genloop and qlop) Perhaps because each has features that the other doesn't (genlop's --date, = for example). Also, as long as involved people don't consider it a waste of time, it's no= t a waste of time - it's their time, after all. Regards, --=20 Andrej "Ticho" Kacian Gentoo Linux Developer - net-mail, antivirus, sound, x86 --Sig_8iZOTntncOFq4MZj0BH9EiZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGG4oZQlM6RnzZP+IRAqa2AJ99lMb3RsbJPP9C4Yzo6mUsM2VGZgCfXllx dy0PMoaQz1PiBdpDrL5Nwx4= =Jagl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_8iZOTntncOFq4MZj0BH9EiZ-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list