From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HZYBK-00050j-0r for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2007 20:03:42 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l35K2aUW013405; Thu, 5 Apr 2007 20:02:36 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l35Jxcmg008987 for ; Thu, 5 Apr 2007 19:59:38 GMT Received: from phi.witten.lan (p83.129.3.96.tisdip.tiscali.de [83.129.3.96]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E495A64354 for ; Thu, 5 Apr 2007 19:59:37 +0000 (UTC) From: Danny van Dyk Organization: Gentoo To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for April Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 22:15:23 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <20070401092940.1B4C26441E@smtp.gentoo.org> <20070405092641.00676b6d@snowflake> <20070405120912.GA5025@superlupo> In-Reply-To: <20070405120912.GA5025@superlupo> X-Face: =?utf-8?q?57Z3foFdBj=3BKdmU=5EFM=2Eec=5C4=7BQf/F6=25ePh=5C=5DM=5EaXPX*=5D?= =?utf-8?q?J5S=7CM=7E+vR=3F=24iW=5Cn44=5E2sguPTOtw=0A=09fe+7gKTm*!OXGQPYqML?= =?utf-8?q?=7CL1ezSI3-=27E=25zxZigvAK?=>3$?~'4IPBoi\H2)pV6U(26V@ =?utf-8?q?jq=7CAIp=0A=09yY?=>'!D}EOi=Q+-|CIh-d4riWfZZ">G.Rj!}78kX$8Zt0:epNWTo[{_/zJb< =?utf-8?q?Ud=2Eon=7EprEW*=0A=09tIvqI=7B+e=3AgMC?= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200704052215.23988.kugelfang@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 40c66023-362e-4585-a555-ea48a8987aa0 X-Archives-Hash: 3eb31dee59571cb0858289e328ea1720 Am Donnerstag, 5. April 2007 14:09 schrieb Wernfried Haas: > If they want to have sekrit meetings with sekrit handshakes, let > them. If enough people think this is not acceptable, they'll be gone > on the next election. Especially as there are council members who don't rely like any privacy in that at all. vapier comes to my mind there :-D Danny -- Danny van Dyk Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list