From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-22321-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
	id 1HZVNa-0005su-R4
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:04:11 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l35H38Vb012017;
	Thu, 5 Apr 2007 17:03:08 GMT
Received: from outmail1.freedom2surf.net (outmail1.freedom2surf.net [194.106.33.237])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l35GxwmB007347
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 5 Apr 2007 16:59:58 GMT
Received: from snowflake (82-41-57-20.cable.ubr08.edin.blueyonder.co.uk [82.41.57.20])
	by outmail1.freedom2surf.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F25FC52753
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu,  5 Apr 2007 17:59:58 +0100 (BST)
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 18:00:03 +0100
From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@ciaranm.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for April
Message-ID: <20070405180003.2c157ea1@snowflake>
In-Reply-To: <1175790246.8641.46.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org>
References: <20070401092940.1B4C26441E@smtp.gentoo.org>
	<20070404193643.GA7174@ubik>
	<20070404201717.GB25883@feynman.corp.halliburton.com>
	<20070405092641.00676b6d@snowflake>
	<20070405120912.GA5025@superlupo>
	<20070405145119.48a89957@snowflake>
	<1175784457.8641.26.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org>
	<20070405160049.0d958651@snowflake>
	<1175786542.8641.35.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org>
	<46151DF9.40308@gentoo.org>
	<1175790246.8641.46.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.8.1 (GTK+ 2.10.9; i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Sig_cNM_OpUjBxtiScqrKW3HCuX;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1
X-Archives-Salt: bc00c7e5-8fcb-45e7-a07d-5e1402e3f82e
X-Archives-Hash: 849be56b4720b93c340f6a45c2e414ce

--Sig_cNM_OpUjBxtiScqrKW3HCuX
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 12:24:06 -0400
Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Well, from what I can gather, he only *thinks* he knows what was going
> on and he's filled in the blanks himself with whatever ideas he's come
> up with on his own.  If he really does have the logs, he wouldn't be
> spouting off at the mouth since he would know that there's nothing
> damning in there, at all.

I know that you and kingtaco threatened to remove a fellow Council
member's access if he didn't go along with you on whatever it was you
were discussing. If there's nothing damning in there, why would you do
such a thing?

> I'm not sure I follow what you're saying here.  Are you saying that
> Gentoo developers would lose trust in us because we are keeping our
> word to people who spoke to us in confidence?  Are you referring to a
> potential leak?

There is nothing stopping you from posting a several paragraph summary
of whatever it was that was being discussed. Leave gaps for
confidential things as appropriate, but don't use it as an excuse for
burying the whole thing as you're trying to do here.

--=20
Ciaran McCreesh


--Sig_cNM_OpUjBxtiScqrKW3HCuX
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGFSsW96zL6DUtXhERAkTBAKDldC3P/hQWFK9F7ICuGfK7q+ySkQCgsoRk
JrGFGwkGx0QscAgJudHep2c=
=afHI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_cNM_OpUjBxtiScqrKW3HCuX--
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list