From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HZQpJ-0008U2-Vh for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2007 12:12:30 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l35CBUnQ026532; Thu, 5 Apr 2007 12:11:30 GMT Received: from mailrelay.tugraz.at (mailrelay.tu-graz.ac.at [129.27.2.202]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l35C9Glg023712 for ; Thu, 5 Apr 2007 12:09:16 GMT Received: from superlupo.localdomain (fanachpc62.tu-graz.ac.at [129.27.185.72]) (authenticated bits=0) by mailrelay1.tugraz.at (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l35C9EOT009522 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 5 Apr 2007 14:09:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: by superlupo.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8D44B57B8C; Thu, 5 Apr 2007 14:09:12 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 14:09:12 +0200 From: Wernfried Haas To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for April Message-ID: <20070405120912.GA5025@superlupo> References: <20070401092940.1B4C26441E@smtp.gentoo.org> <20070404193643.GA7174@ubik> <20070404201717.GB25883@feynman.corp.halliburton.com> <20070405092641.00676b6d@snowflake> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070405092641.00676b6d@snowflake> User-Agent: mutt-ng/devel-r804 (Linux) X-Spam-Scanner: SpamAssassin 3.001008 X-Spam-Score-relay: -1.5 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.61 on 129.27.10.18 X-Archives-Salt: fb72d125-2098-40fc-aebc-e291d6d2f029 X-Archives-Hash: ff80102611b97fcbaa2fdba8592329b9 --rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 09:26:41AM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > Unfortunately, what the GLEP doesn't do is prevent the Council from > having secret meetings and refusing to discuss not only the content of > those meetings but even the topic. Perhaps a requirement that any > Council meeting logs be made public would be useful, with a waiver > that the Council can have a secret meeting if it officially announces > that it is doing so? If they want to have sekrit meetings with sekrit handshakes, let them. If enough people think this is not acceptable, they'll be gone on the next election. cheers, Wernfried --=20 Wernfried Haas (amne) - amne at gentoo dot org Gentoo Forums: http://forums.gentoo.org IRC: #gentoo-forums on freenode - email: forum-mods at gentoo dot org --rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGFOboK/GNBBblp4ARAtPnAJ9l5v2RVPXI+YXxBiQKzZ1unTWUagCgikWU BwQXOPRDRzLj9ViHRkOKdqI= =W1rD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list