From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HXjQA-0002dg-62 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 31 Mar 2007 19:39:30 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l2VJcNPg023097; Sat, 31 Mar 2007 19:38:23 GMT Received: from kerberos.ynet.sk (proxy.ynet.sk [147.175.189.193]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l2VJaXqg020844 for ; Sat, 31 Mar 2007 19:36:34 GMT Received: from daria.ynet.sk (daria.ynet.sk [147.175.178.246]) by kerberos.ynet.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9B6636C2A1 for ; Sat, 31 Mar 2007 21:36:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from Kacian2.emea.hpqcorp.net (vhiker [192.168.111.3]) by daria.ynet.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id A825011E66 for ; Sat, 31 Mar 2007 21:36:23 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 21:34:00 +0200 From: Andrej Kacian To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [soc] Python bindings for Paludis Message-ID: <20070331213400.271f9856@Kacian2.emea.hpqcorp.net> In-Reply-To: <1175369043.5961.30.camel@localhost> References: <200703240028.15461.peper@gentoo.org> <200703271519.29674.vapier@gentoo.org> <20070327211510.0b426e09@snowflake> <200703301404.16400.vapier@gentoo.org> <20070331201602.3e50b815@Kacian2.emea.hpqcorp.net> <1175369043.5961.30.camel@localhost> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.8.0 (GTK+ 2.6.10; i686-pc-cygwin) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 98942631-8ec3-41eb-8a75-dd7f41e1a97e X-Archives-Hash: 7615a067c263cff350466f0cd9b317b5 On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 15:24:03 -0400 Seemant Kulleen wrote: > The point being made, then, is that for an official package manager to > exist *for Gentoo*, it needs to be under *Gentoo's* control. Well, the source is open, and there are already enough Gentoo devs working on it, so it's not like Gentoo can't control what's being used. Let's say paludis does become the official PM for Gentoo. This would undoubtedly mean that (even more) Gentoo developers would be working on it, likely with Ciaran's (or anyone else without @gentoo.org's) contributions. How is that different from non-developers submitting patches to portage? Kind regards, -- Andrej -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list