From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HXSys-0002xA-AL for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 31 Mar 2007 02:06:14 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l2V25KX5000883; Sat, 31 Mar 2007 02:05:20 GMT Received: from mail.marples.name (rsm.demon.co.uk [80.177.111.50]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l2V22TLG029341 for ; Sat, 31 Mar 2007 02:02:30 GMT Received: from uberpc.marples.name (uberpc.marples.name [IPv6:fee1::f20b:aaff:fe00:2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.marples.name (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD9D2190038 for ; Sat, 31 Mar 2007 03:02:29 +0100 (BST) Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 03:02:40 +0100 From: Roy Marples To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [soc] Python bindings for Paludis Message-ID: <20070331030240.7bd266b1@uberpc.marples.name> In-Reply-To: <20070330212332.31c1bee7@snowflake> References: <200703240028.15461.peper@gentoo.org> <200703251403.38629.vapier@gentoo.org> <4606BF5C.9060304@klever.net> <200703271519.29674.vapier@gentoo.org> <20070327211510.0b426e09@snowflake> <308E0F46-7457-48E2-956F-23FB8439B6FD@gentoo.org> <20070329095658.2851e8c4@snowflake> <9F32AF2F-86CB-4199-8E87-A93E7F5F372F@gentoo.org> <20070329185059.12bf7569@snowflake> <20070330211318.1076d085@uberpc.marples.name> <20070330212332.31c1bee7@snowflake> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.8.1 (GTK+ 2.10.11; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: ab60fb5e-18ea-4d2f-a6f5-521acc59dc1b X-Archives-Hash: c11761a2ba2a78dfdd0516457d3c2c53 On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 21:23:32 +0100 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > You seem to be under the misapprehension that Portage == Gentoo. > > No no, I'm saying that at present Portage is one of Gentoo's most > severe limiting factors. Then kindly stop interchanging Portage with Gentoo which you seem to do on a frequent basis. Thanks Roy -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list