From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HXNWc-0001qc-Lm for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 30 Mar 2007 20:16:43 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l2UKFWre021446; Fri, 30 Mar 2007 20:15:32 GMT Received: from mail.marples.name (rsm.demon.co.uk [80.177.111.50]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l2UKD9Zs018323 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2007 20:13:09 GMT Received: from uberpc.marples.name (uberpc.marples.name [IPv6:fee1::f20b:aaff:fe00:2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.marples.name (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FAE2190038 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2007 21:13:08 +0100 (BST) Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 21:13:18 +0100 From: Roy Marples To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [soc] Python bindings for Paludis Message-ID: <20070330211318.1076d085@uberpc.marples.name> In-Reply-To: <20070329185059.12bf7569@snowflake> References: <200703240028.15461.peper@gentoo.org> <200703251403.38629.vapier@gentoo.org> <4606BF5C.9060304@klever.net> <200703271519.29674.vapier@gentoo.org> <20070327211510.0b426e09@snowflake> <308E0F46-7457-48E2-956F-23FB8439B6FD@gentoo.org> <20070329095658.2851e8c4@snowflake> <9F32AF2F-86CB-4199-8E87-A93E7F5F372F@gentoo.org> <20070329185059.12bf7569@snowflake> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.8.1 (GTK+ 2.10.11; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 651125ed-6b4b-4df7-b116-5be0d87cd90b X-Archives-Hash: c9af8802451e2da2fef7eb1ecf66bb8e On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 18:50:59 +0100 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > A few years ago Gentoo had some serious advantages over the > competition. These days, Gentoo is at serious risk of being Red > Queened by Ubuntu and Fedora. Providing the same thing that was > provided two years ago isn't enough. If Portage can't deliver > functionality that makes Gentoo competitive with where Ubuntu will be > a year from now, Portage has to be replaced. You seem to be under the misapprehension that Portage == Gentoo. Portage is a tool that Gentoo uses, but it does not Gentoo. Roy -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list