From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HXRZu-0003jo-0U for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 31 Mar 2007 00:36:22 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l2V0ZJ6u004708; Sat, 31 Mar 2007 00:35:19 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l2V0XL1t002403 for ; Sat, 31 Mar 2007 00:33:22 GMT Received: from home.wh0rd.org (pool-151-203-195-204.bos.east.verizon.net [151.203.195.204]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A21C664BE8 for ; Sat, 31 Mar 2007 00:33:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 17562 invoked from network); 30 Mar 2007 19:26:53 -0500 Received: from unknown (HELO vapier) (192.168.0.2) by 192.168.0.1 with SMTP; 30 Mar 2007 19:26:53 -0500 From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [soc] Python bindings for Paludis Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 20:33:23 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <200703240028.15461.peper@gentoo.org> <200703301651.54783.vapier@gentoo.org> <6D25C059-0342-48C9-8DB9-B8932FFE24D8@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <6D25C059-0342-48C9-8DB9-B8932FFE24D8@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2629901.4cJoIfmdKD"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200703302033.24005.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 086d2a33-0ccc-49a9-9567-321b7083d783 X-Archives-Hash: 4e241cdeb87b27c56159f802f1df815d --nextPart2629901.4cJoIfmdKD Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 30 March 2007, Anant Narayanan wrote: > The logic is flawed. I don't understand why Gentoo can't switch to > paludis so long as there are "in-house" Gentoo developers ready to > maintain and support it. that is your opinion. mine is that the official package manager must be le= d=20 and maintained in-house. > It is a rather trivial issue to wrap paludis or pkgcore commands to > their "emerge" equivalents i never said it wasnt ... all i said is that it must exist =2Dmike --nextPart2629901.4cJoIfmdKD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUARg2sU0FjO5/oN/WBAQIKCxAA1ASHBOzdw9YALn8gMVIl2lkmfMDDgan7 aPfwmxmYbTSPT4blHbrWMtas6dwwpw9M7BS4sL/rdb7aNjhhF0xOf5IiIVayIb7n w/F4AQ3nDgBL4TQPYh8IiRg/tydcqWvZ+tyBwhBHHYbf3g/9z+gHWQggA4GHfOcl a7XObGmaPF53samHQbslB5ECWFDd9vpjW/o5pTYR8djOOrgwFtmqt4oD0bKHu8EO lAsAKPjaAvwvLC+FkrnVX4JQk6p0grB28jbJzKxqRZlLrvDTYi7vGO7FG9wYCKGA 3rQhno6iw7HILqgOqFewSOnQWXsSCyzplXOScHZnyJg6JTr8ydMK2n5JfEnXLg36 LGgB3ti/EXk6aEmiU35+1NymmVZRbRRhfRQxZ3hdPgXIJjjlizgsWuyXlXn43QL/ qfmR5vBqVfedemO3PSVpbBzFdqdNoZNb/WPMZI4enmf8H5o51d+xUFyZgzPx6RtE HgTB0ogre8bSRvX+o8K9q6jjwg7/t+cdNqvnmkvVMrCWsigUU8qjIKM2se3MCLmt zfKzMxg3fEeZL8ItabE+GC7/HU4S+lCub1/KY9zYt9td+t0R29dG4o/nlH3Mv6SB h8P68WEZvB/tKy1ndc2gYQzPSOkvmhvv9RfBpvzaT1g/aqtV4gdGnNMpou1bZeJ0 iGfVbPvKdrg= =8aFD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2629901.4cJoIfmdKD-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list