From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HXMJg-0002bH-Fl for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 30 Mar 2007 18:59:16 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l2UIwCDh022186; Fri, 30 Mar 2007 18:58:12 GMT Received: from outmail1.freedom2surf.net (outmail1.freedom2surf.net [194.106.33.237]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l2UIuHCU019901 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2007 18:56:17 GMT Received: from snowflake (82-41-57-20.cable.ubr08.edin.blueyonder.co.uk [82.41.57.20]) by outmail1.freedom2surf.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD2FC50409 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2007 19:56:17 +0100 (BST) Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 19:56:20 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [soc] Python bindings for Paludis Message-ID: <20070330195620.19054275@snowflake> In-Reply-To: <1175280640.7385.8.camel@laptop> References: <200703240028.15461.peper@gentoo.org> <200703271519.29674.vapier@gentoo.org> <20070327211510.0b426e09@snowflake> <200703301404.16400.vapier@gentoo.org> <20070330193517.1c84fda1@snowflake> <1175280640.7385.8.camel@laptop> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.8.1 (GTK+ 2.10.9; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_vhDMzFXQ3MItwEPM/dx/BbN"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 951d8445-e2a8-4618-a2c4-e92df924ca08 X-Archives-Hash: e50d9e697b2e9d40b06754c5f327f04e --Sig_vhDMzFXQ3MItwEPM/dx/BbN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 13:50:39 -0500 Homer Parker wrote: > Wouldn't this be the same as all MTAs providing sendmail > compatibility? Whereas existing tools still Just Work? It depends upon the degree to which one specifies 'sendmail compatibility'. Does it mean "shares some of the same commandline options" or "shares exactly the same configuration file format and all bugs and produces identical output"? --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_vhDMzFXQ3MItwEPM/dx/BbN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGDV1Y96zL6DUtXhERAru9AKCCv2y1eE+FSyMAPb7nevoVZ4jjIwCgs+3i +BZ32hVyeBGYF5B0VH70u7I= =gXWn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_vhDMzFXQ3MItwEPM/dx/BbN-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list