From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HXOC3-0004m6-7b for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 30 Mar 2007 20:59:31 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l2UKw1dr004405; Fri, 30 Mar 2007 20:58:01 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l2UKs3LG029507 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2007 20:54:03 GMT Received: from home.wh0rd.org (pool-151-203-195-204.bos.east.verizon.net [151.203.195.204]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 203E364C29 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2007 20:54:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 7016 invoked from network); 30 Mar 2007 15:47:50 -0500 Received: from unknown (HELO vapier) (192.168.0.2) by 192.168.0.1 with SMTP; 30 Mar 2007 15:47:50 -0500 From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [soc] Python bindings for Paludis Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 16:54:17 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <200703240028.15461.peper@gentoo.org> <1175280152.5696.12.camel@sputnik886.lnet> <1175282932.5964.9.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1175282932.5964.9.camel@localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart11301438.JuMQ6PnNYS"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200703301654.17742.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 22f8af5f-0f8c-4910-9832-5bb0a04da1df X-Archives-Hash: 35a25932bfc4a869a6d8ae2992efb55a --nextPart11301438.JuMQ6PnNYS Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 30 March 2007, Seemant Kulleen wrote: > On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 20:42 +0200, Matthias Langer wrote: > > i don't think that personal issues should be taken into account when it > > comes to choosing a new official package manager for gentoo. > > It's relevant in that people have to work with the developers of the > package manager. Unlike most other things in the portage tree, the > package manager ties very closely to the very definition of the > distribution itself. Hence, if people are unable to get along, then by > adopting a package manager like that, you inherently adopt the > developers of that package manager and all the personnel issues that > accompany it. > > Ideally, however, I agree with you that it should be based on technical > merits. The reality is that there are people involved. And people > always complicate things. thanks seemant, preciously how i'd have put it if i could :) -mike --nextPart11301438.JuMQ6PnNYS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUARg14+UFjO5/oN/WBAQIIZQ/+LG9XIfMlvzPSOaaLu7jnczL2oJfwe/Ux LUD67btAqprWSO/L0hGkY9JwS80zWpsXnI7x2JW70rt8sDrQ3weiy7tuZenncVB1 u51sAlmbbTNfUevl5bLBSuvAkxcRHpCKMdyRld9UJCwE58K0lhGuj9IvlhVGU9F4 e8MVund6U5/ZsvnReNYNToZdeJF+ZNVEkXBx5X8E6tBNLH9O7DIMdfh/mqF2McEa Eugbd0fOPoUFKXAoMeyE5dgpiWQ+FmneyQ+BN+i86fEjMuvky/gXH/Y9hJ6qaA15 uFH+jwWcYIsPUBek/IwpHqEzP1snocmr0WzjC17AeS3td9iYTc5kcHY4KknZA3cA T8kux3Ry2oUR+DbM51pjZkPjA6MhCHS/+yy2sQEpS4GMv5rGbHXgcusLfju0MFj7 sdnYxEqrqtFBUkcq7ttjeWjNOR7l8SGmxKjdsGT2EjyiLESTacZKlop17WPaCwho kqkHaBw2HhU1E1rxLxB6WqutNUs+AI7UWtU5pYMScfBUfKYuKAU2iNB7l99rxnJI sfqJF3RZgE2o8hE7/PllVljVvmgnh25rqBxAdh2Fmfj34UC15SwC6KCo1AehErTJ U7XubJwr3vxOibtMAOAcTzQBYK6SCWeWHe0oNC2EyuegjyNnjcqwrIUtFECzArzm rOhPgW10F3U= =zMKq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart11301438.JuMQ6PnNYS-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list