From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HX1pB-0001Nh-SO for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 21:06:27 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l2TL48kZ017020; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 21:04:08 GMT Received: from ppsw-0.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-0.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.130]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l2TL0mdU012455 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 21:00:48 GMT X-Cam-SpamDetails: Not scanned X-Cam-AntiVirus: No virus found X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/ Received: from cpc4-cmbg1-0-0-cust196.cmbg.cable.ntl.com ([82.21.108.197]:46162 helo=blashyrk) by ppsw-0.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.150]:465) with esmtpsa (LOGIN:spb42) (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) id 1HX1i7-0003Hu-0v (Exim 4.63) for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org (return-path ); Thu, 29 Mar 2007 21:59:07 +0100 Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 22:00:03 +0100 From: Stephen Bennett To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [soc] Python bindings for Paludis Message-ID: <20070329220003.2220dc66@blashyrk> In-Reply-To: <1175200411.15394.57.camel@onyx.private.gni.com> References: <200703240028.15461.peper@gentoo.org> <200703251403.38629.vapier@gentoo.org> <4606BF5C.9060304@klever.net> <200703271519.29674.vapier@gentoo.org> <20070327211510.0b426e09@snowflake> <308E0F46-7457-48E2-956F-23FB8439B6FD@gentoo.org> <20070329095658.2851e8c4@snowflake> <1175194656.15394.38.camel@onyx.private.gni.com> <20070329200608.3b2c2b6f@snowflake> <1175196300.15394.45.camel@onyx.private.gni.com> <20070329210224.65c7a1fd@snowflake> <1175200411.15394.57.camel@onyx.private.gni.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.8.1 (GTK+ 2.10.11; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "S.P. Bennett" X-Archives-Salt: 804c5ed5-fc76-4d70-83e8-81ab40c5e63a X-Archives-Hash: c352da3414c597a8e8bf7c0c3404fdf1 On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 13:33:31 -0700 Ned Ludd wrote: > The correct reply should of been. > "I'm sorry I did not mean to offend anybody. I'll make an effort to > not make any cheap shots" That would have been a possible response. Another reasonable response would have been the one that he made, clarifying his original statement in case someone took offence where none was meant. If one reads the mails in a spirit of giving someone the benefit of the doubt rather than automatically thinking the worst, there's no reason this subthread needed to exist. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list