From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HVVNN-0000TE-W4 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 16:15:26 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l2PGENhw018358; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 16:14:23 GMT Received: from ppsw-2.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-2.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.132]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l2PGCWTj016100 for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 16:12:32 GMT X-Cam-SpamDetails: Not scanned X-Cam-AntiVirus: No virus found X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/ Received: from 82-46-45-120.cable.ubr06.newt.blueyonder.co.uk ([82.46.45.120]:37026 helo=blashyrk) by ppsw-2.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.152]:465) with esmtpsa (LOGIN:spb42) (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) id 1HVVKX-0007x5-79 (Exim 4.63) for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org (return-path ); Sun, 25 Mar 2007 17:12:29 +0100 Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 17:13:08 +0100 From: Stephen Bennett To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposed addition to the Social Contract Message-ID: <20070325171308.4edbd786@blashyrk> In-Reply-To: <460696B9.3040900@gentoo.org> References: <1174788467.4883.29.camel@bruichladdich> <200703250454.34744.vapier@gentoo.org> <20070325155220.6188004d@snowflake> <200703251100.00415.vapier@gentoo.org> <20070325160719.0a4d15c3@snowflake> <46069454.5070700@exceedtech.net> <460696B9.3040900@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.8.1 (GTK+ 2.10.11; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "S.P. Bennett" X-Archives-Salt: e0467b33-e77f-4844-b994-a56eac2a3239 X-Archives-Hash: ab45fb55435511ba6c8720dfd5745549 On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 17:35:21 +0200 Luca Barbato wrote: > Gentoo should use whichever basket could fit... Just because there is a basket that can fit all our eggs should not prevent us from looking, where possible, for other baskets that would let us distribute them more evenly. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list