From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HVUMB-00023D-TY for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 15:10:08 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l2PF99iv023545; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 15:09:09 GMT Received: from outmail1.freedom2surf.net (outmail1.freedom2surf.net [194.106.33.237]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l2PF7H7p021301 for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 15:07:17 GMT Received: from snowflake (82-41-57-20.cable.ubr08.edin.blueyonder.co.uk [82.41.57.20]) by outmail1.freedom2surf.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 708DC50EBE for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 16:07:17 +0100 (BST) Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 16:07:19 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposed addition to the Social Contract Message-ID: <20070325160719.0a4d15c3@snowflake> In-Reply-To: <200703251100.00415.vapier@gentoo.org> References: <1174788467.4883.29.camel@bruichladdich> <200703250454.34744.vapier@gentoo.org> <20070325155220.6188004d@snowflake> <200703251100.00415.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.8.1 (GTK+ 2.10.9; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 5918f33e-739e-4fe7-8f66-2bc02c568d7f X-Archives-Hash: 6c672af1275c4455cd9429e99ab6bf06 On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 11:00:00 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Sunday 25 March 2007, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > i dont see why this is required ? ignoring the fact that the > > > wording is way too vague to do anything but cause confusion and > > > people to spout long winded rants, seems like useless nitpicking > > > about an issue that doesnt exist > > > > Well, I believe one hypothetical situation which it would address > > would be something like this: > > blow your conspiracy theories somewhere else Hm? Like I said, it was a hypothetical situation. I'm not suggesting that anything like that has ever happened, merely that Christel's idea of protecting Gentoo from that kind of thing in the future isn't a bad thing... -- Ciaran McCreesh -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list