From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-21920-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
	id 1HVUGE-0001Eq-V1
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 15:03:59 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l2PF2o5U017245;
	Sun, 25 Mar 2007 15:02:50 GMT
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l2PExZbw012789
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 14:59:35 GMT
Received: from home.wh0rd.org (pool-151-203-195-204.bos.east.verizon.net [151.203.195.204])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 328AE6509E
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 14:59:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 7036 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2007 09:55:01 -0500
Received: from unknown (HELO vapier) (192.168.0.2)
  by 192.168.0.1 with SMTP; 25 Mar 2007 09:55:01 -0500
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
Organization: wh0rd.org
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposed addition to the Social Contract
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 11:00:00 -0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6
References: <1174788467.4883.29.camel@bruichladdich> <200703250454.34744.vapier@gentoo.org> <20070325155220.6188004d@snowflake>
In-Reply-To: <20070325155220.6188004d@snowflake>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  boundary="nextPart13072316.NUSayC0A1k";
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200703251100.00415.vapier@gentoo.org>
X-Archives-Salt: e3efc917-9f65-4688-bf36-b781994da66e
X-Archives-Hash: dfc9b5b6d2a93e0920ce6445db198474

--nextPart13072316.NUSayC0A1k
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

On Sunday 25 March 2007, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > i dont see why this is required ?  ignoring the fact that the wording
> > is way too vague to do anything but cause confusion and people to
> > spout long winded rants, seems like useless nitpicking about an issue
> > that doesnt exist
>
> Well, I believe one hypothetical situation which it would address would
> be something like this:

blow your conspiracy theories somewhere else
-mike

--nextPart13072316.NUSayC0A1k
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (GNU/Linux)
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=2cgL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart13072316.NUSayC0A1k--
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list