From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-21909-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
	id 1HVOX8-00006Y-Ms
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 08:57:03 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l2P8u3ZY020581;
	Sun, 25 Mar 2007 08:56:03 GMT
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l2P8sAIv018239
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 08:54:11 GMT
Received: from home.wh0rd.org (pool-151-203-195-204.bos.east.verizon.net [151.203.195.204])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D086064FC4
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 08:54:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 15981 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2007 03:49:42 -0500
Received: from unknown (HELO vapier) (192.168.0.2)
  by 192.168.0.1 with SMTP; 25 Mar 2007 03:49:42 -0500
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
Organization: wh0rd.org
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposed addition to the Social Contract
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 04:54:33 -0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6
References: <1174788467.4883.29.camel@bruichladdich>
In-Reply-To: <1174788467.4883.29.camel@bruichladdich>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  boundary="nextPart2123995.ebpBWWYyZR";
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200703250454.34744.vapier@gentoo.org>
X-Archives-Salt: 4659d218-05c3-4e71-abbe-e864424ffa5d
X-Archives-Hash: 1442396309af239336a4419f2b16143c

--nextPart2123995.ebpBWWYyZR
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-6"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Saturday 24 March 2007, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote:
> It looks like our social contract doesn't prohibit Gentoo from being
> dependent upon a single sponsor or corporation. In the interests of
> keeping Gentoo run by the developers rather than any outside party, how
> about the following addition to the Social Contract?
>
> <heading>We will be run by the Development Community</>
> Gentoo will be run by the development community. We will never allow
> ourselves to be reliant upon a single sponsor or corporation.

i dont see why this is required ?  ignoring the fact that the wording is wa=
y=20
too vague to do anything but cause confusion and people to spout long winde=
d=20
rants, seems like useless nitpicking about an issue that doesnt exist
=2Dmike

--nextPart2123995.ebpBWWYyZR
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (GNU/Linux)

iQIVAwUARgY4ykFjO5/oN/WBAQKkJg/+Nyww4jbbXJtKYUkp9829jsP8yvb2OlCs
qO0u/tmP7ftf/Bp5hlm5yG+0k8r4/YUNGnmshL93PK7PMqRbTpr8uCJ0onpAi5nb
O1tAIEQNjRqwR+ORRpn7P7jaLLc32ar3mc/+HDN2RbP8YZ0YI6CILqoHzoTQSHVJ
Vik37NefBs7VsJBnMU2McUjsEAn7aca4ioGC/AqjghvkKFFZ/RIdj7r5967aydvg
cazc00tovVSux6OhT1ICJhsznwQw4ZBRXnOpQ3SqLq+ucHdc8LgUK0KDFp1cu1oV
OB4aSm1UeD6XuIyeYpOhbia+aQKDO1PHwe10k7NW5PvUDbNDyl9LaTkVrNCQfZa5
h9Os3tWyJ1VR9IkDqpHalEF+mxYF5SVZnTy/RX6dLTP2hh5AFqcGou58hi0PERt5
iD8jZKuN5cTxglGgLp9mNYxZupj/5Xuh7sLOpYMvIE8s7g1JyC7QI6tAEJGeqB86
Obg1wFBZeyIfk634wvzXzUIPrNjtuo3vlwdqiVkBHXSj6LP6p8GjlOF/IbPA+kte
RkCXVET+dbrw4tnQcZmFqRm3+WctUPtssHpDmV1E2JI8ZIXAYziAtmOVHTiWFBB+
IgfxAtDQRVgzTpT6Oz1Q+Ce9H5kV1pIEX7ItPz8zVmbJElN+n2LbdQ17dm4iEF18
I8GVqJQHWRs=
=EKv1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart2123995.ebpBWWYyZR--
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list