From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HV9Qh-0004QC-BE for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 24 Mar 2007 16:49:23 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l2OGmQQu008006; Sat, 24 Mar 2007 16:48:26 GMT Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.188]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l2OGkc2I005903 for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2007 16:46:39 GMT Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id c31so4164415nfb for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2007 09:46:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id:sender; b=lwgKRbOKRLRoYjRfxXsXk63fh788Ev1WZOjvn/kp0cMFeOvinHL4iXmqyk/Sb+2xhvMSm73ZqJpD6cpRZsYqvSUhrgN5kX4VsUlPlyqsF4zKZ9abHa86vAkYjV45G/QXV9Ebj1ZeXFmQutDywy9m1K80mwVR/yZSeBbtEszd+a0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id:sender; b=IEf1i5pVUUETSBgBZJf6FIDU6d2wRMDUByhuYl82GUee7hhLQ9sVHWC7OlCRW2YwzwyOZMaHBL4J5/DmnQEAASIRAR6aap/K1kPqqg83Sc4DG9siEO49qr+fZvdUKLLBmLZ3TmtKEUPhAfE95t6JRVFSI6CoLv3Jbi8PHIbni88= Received: by 10.82.138.6 with SMTP id l6mr9559426bud.1174754798788; Sat, 24 Mar 2007 09:46:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from phoebe.lan ( [82.210.165.130]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u9sm12518702muf.2007.03.24.09.46.37; Sat, 24 Mar 2007 09:46:37 -0700 (PDT) From: Piotr =?utf-8?q?Jaroszy=C5=84ski?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [soc] Python bindings for Paludis Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2007 17:46:33 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <200703240028.15461.peper@gentoo.org> <20070324160656.GA11386@dst.grantgoodyear.org> <4605523F.8070002@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4605523F.8070002@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200703241746.33546.peper@gentoo.org> Sender: =?UTF-8?B?UGlvdHIgSmFyb3N6ecWEc2tp?= X-Archives-Salt: 5a730e56-318d-46e4-970d-de36550d4db9 X-Archives-Hash: 778571de1cacafb2c142ca514b24da67 On Saturday 24 of March 2007 17:30:55 Mike Doty wrote: > Yes. pioto's proposal is weak. lu_zero's counterproposal for developing > a method of having a package manager agnostic "API" is much more useful > than developing one language binding for one package manager. 1. pioto is a mentor this year... ;] 2. hardly technical issue 3. see ciaran's post =2D-=20 Best Regards, Piotr Jaroszy=C5=84ski -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list