From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HV9lO-00024y-Ly for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 24 Mar 2007 17:10:47 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l2OH97KV022265; Sat, 24 Mar 2007 17:09:07 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l2OH5Dsd016611 for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2007 17:05:16 GMT Received: from localhost (adsl-67-67-81-246.dsl.hstntx.swbell.net [67.67.81.246]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1878B64A91 for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2007 16:51:11 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2007 11:51:16 -0500 From: Grant Goodyear To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [soc] Python bindings for Paludis Message-ID: <20070324165116.GD11386@dst.grantgoodyear.org> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <200703240028.15461.peper@gentoo.org> <46048B1D.9040107@gentoo.org> <200703240150.20710.vapier@gentoo.org> <20070324125451.GF13708@paradox.datanode.net> <20070324160656.GA11386@dst.grantgoodyear.org> <4605523F.8070002@gentoo.org> <20070324163845.7a6640bf@snowflake> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BI5RvnYi6R4T2M87" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070324163845.7a6640bf@snowflake> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.14 (2007-02-12) X-Archives-Salt: 6639ce0a-82ac-48f1-bd06-4dd442ecc271 X-Archives-Hash: 4a14805a3ead68e3219e005002e41aea --BI5RvnYi6R4T2M87 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ciaran McCreesh wrote: [Sat Mar 24 2007, 11:38:45AM CDT] > On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 09:30:55 -0700 > Mike Doty wrote: > > Grant Goodyear wrote: > > [snip] > > > PS. So, anybody have any actual technical comments about this > > > proposal? > > > > Yes. pioto's proposal is weak. lu_zero's counterproposal for > > developing a method of having a package manager agnostic "API" is > > much more useful than developing one language binding for one package > > manager. Weird, I haven't received Mike's e-mail yet, although I got ciaranm's reply. In any event, I agree that lu_zero's idea would be preferable, if it could be implemented. I'm agnostic on that point at the moment, though, since it's hard to evaluate from lu_zero's brief sketch. I'd love to see a true detailed proposal. -g2boojum- --=20 Grant Goodyear=09 Gentoo Developer g2boojum@gentoo.org http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76 --BI5RvnYi6R4T2M87 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGBVcEptxxUuD2W3YRArRSAJwJCaH7cU6dXkriEUZz490FbpaRlACbB7xi VI67IQUrz5es12gjwB6qoMs= =TAwt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --BI5RvnYi6R4T2M87-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list