From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-19988-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
	id 1H6zN5-0003iq-Fy
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 01:13:47 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id l0H1CsX4028962;
	Wed, 17 Jan 2007 01:12:54 GMT
Received: from mx2.suse.de (mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l0H1AuUC017530
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 01:10:56 GMT
Received: from Relay2.suse.de (mail2.suse.de [195.135.221.8])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4248B2101E
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 02:10:56 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 17:10:12 -0800
From: Greg KH <gregkh@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev]  Re: [RFC] Some sync control
Message-ID: <20070117011012.GB15114@kroah.com>
References: <200701112229.58538.peper@gentoo.org> <45A6B0F7.9060301@gentoo.org> <20070111220839.GC26246@curie-int.orbis-terrarum.net> <1168555903.9780.58.camel@localhost> <20070111232257.GE26246@curie-int.orbis-terrarum.net> <eoitda$gbm$1@sea.gmane.org> <eojs1o$e14$1@sea.gmane.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <eojs1o$e14$1@sea.gmane.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
X-Archives-Salt: 49c3ce92-2d48-4f0a-b4a1-2395de1cafe8
X-Archives-Hash: d94e687afc5b2823f4dfd9eee579dd06

On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 01:53:12AM +0100, Markus Ullmann wrote:
> I've talked to a friend of mine recently. He's a FreeBSD dev and he said 
> they tried git for their ports tree (which is basically the same what 
> we're talking about) and it was more or less a big pain for multiple 
> reasons.
> He said he'd personally take svn after that experience.

What was the reasons he cited?

thanks,

greg k-h
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list