From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1H3FLN-0002kD-6F for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 06 Jan 2007 17:28:33 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id l06HRfQt023648; Sat, 6 Jan 2007 17:27:41 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l06HPmQ8028703 for ; Sat, 6 Jan 2007 17:25:49 GMT Received: from home.wh0rd.org (pool-141-154-238-235.bos.east.verizon.net [141.154.238.235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6761F649FA for ; Sat, 6 Jan 2007 17:25:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23431 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2007 12:24:01 -0500 Received: from unknown (HELO vapier) (192.168.0.2) by 192.168.0.1 with SMTP; 6 Jan 2007 12:24:01 -0500 From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] autotools eclass - set default for WANT_AUTO* Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 12:25:48 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <200701061210.33600.alonbl@gentoo.org> <200701061042.55995.vapier@gentoo.org> <200701061705.43569@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> In-Reply-To: <200701061705.43569@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1569047.KDz5R6FntY"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200701061225.49301.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 9ec7b427-eff1-4e38-bd29-ebd6d57c003f X-Archives-Hash: 694d7475edde36ef598bc7c2c009caac --nextPart1569047.KDz5R6FntY Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Saturday 06 January 2007 11:05, Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten=F2 wrote: > On Saturday 06 January 2007 16:42, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > what does it matter if all of the ebuilds declare latest or the eclass > > declares latest ? > > Weren't we going to allow declaring "1.10 1.9" soon, so that we could stop > using "latest" ? no, that was not the reason at all for the new syntax the reason was so in the *eclass* you could translate latest to "1.10 1.9" = and=20 drop the need of executing that helper function in local scope =2Dmike --nextPart1569047.KDz5R6FntY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.1 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUARZ/bnUFjO5/oN/WBAQLsMhAAplIM/3iOmiFKjtnPgOqyry0OkrnFO+sY JoiINQt5r7pmckQjSSuzu400WFbonP8Mcn0sDHM3n376szuU+vnaZJvY+7khRW3G 4SWkzMAFB6HeBP20R1ejT4FuSUVFpM9LTPxaq2Daw3c6hL+jBoKJZRuL+N8xSAal AdhWvmqxOz3WYKEWgZS92zhchbrv/ayEWWNiBES6Y3zp3rofjV5potVqGFZ4coHY lFmDGO2uLm1C6Sx1xDva5wtSYPZ+MNgtoSkFNg9WhSzJtGAx7thGEUIQg72UT8vA w+B4i3qu61gUP7TuI34x6GWMIcPDk8WwBQo57ypbi1puFDD1snv3AzK3fyE1abXe u7wT/Vk5xlr2s8aJj8Fj0n4526xfpow7QFAgSZRe4WUqpXqZapvK1sdJZrfDW1kB BUKAfV1VaTFZnjiElGpC/to/0nZhdRNHXmX9nxgcsZHdHu6rsMPuzKIAb5FT7Dtw 4qTce3i9yNPvQDy58UntLrAHhfx/X2AaTQMfZOsnpeY/DMR3Z1TLNiyQlQ+ek+F4 vnBN0F6w058siXefD9XIF9QDM2FCdz2YqkNPnbTxPMx8g5e0si0YCn93u0EBmQGg 4xa7CnE0mZ28/2GMUeSkwHCtwYTVQA4bg34BT0FasXUrDPGEgex0FrSWcJuh/EbM QCBMFJoGgrg= =Kmtc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1569047.KDz5R6FntY-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list