From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@ciaranm.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: making USE_EXPANDed variables incremental
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 20:21:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070102202145.62eb612d@snowdrop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070102211419.5b5685f1@delenn.genone.homeip.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1131 bytes --]
On Tue, 2 Jan 2007 21:14:19 +0100 Marius Mauch <genone@gentoo.org>
wrote:
| On Mon, 1 Jan 2007 21:12:47 +0000
| Stephen Bennett <spb@gentoo.org> wrote:
| > Following a discussion in #gentoo-portage earlier this evening, it
| > was suggested that I send out an RFC email for this. So, does anyone
| > object to requiring that any variable listed in USE_EXPAND be
| > treated as incremental, at least as far as profile inheritance is
| > concerned?
|
| The main problem I see is that if it's becoming a real incremental
| (across all config layers) it would change behavior for users as
| they'd need to prefix their use-expanded vars with -* to retain their
| current config. But I guess that's why you added that final clause
| about profile scope.
You know, making users do that wouldn't necessarily be a bad thing... I
know that Paludis users like having the option of inheriting defaults
from the profile for expanded vars...
--
Ciaran McCreesh
Mail : ciaranm at ciaranm.org
Web : http://ciaranm.org/
Paludis is faster : http://ciaranm.org/show_post.pl?post_id=61
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-02 20:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-01 21:12 [gentoo-dev] RFC: making USE_EXPANDed variables incremental Stephen Bennett
2007-01-01 21:24 ` Donnie Berkholz
2007-01-01 21:44 ` Simon Stelling
2007-01-01 22:49 ` Stephen Bennett
2007-01-01 23:27 ` Donnie Berkholz
2007-01-01 23:32 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2007-01-01 23:47 ` Stephen Bennett
2007-01-02 1:24 ` Donnie Berkholz
2007-01-02 2:03 ` Stephen Bennett
2007-01-02 2:21 ` Donnie Berkholz
2007-01-02 20:14 ` Marius Mauch
2007-01-02 20:21 ` Ciaran McCreesh [this message]
2007-01-02 20:34 ` Marius Mauch
2007-01-02 21:02 ` Josh Saddler
2007-01-02 21:06 ` Stephen Bennett
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070102202145.62eb612d@snowdrop \
--to=ciaranm@ciaranm.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox