From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1H1UL5-000189-O9 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 01 Jan 2007 21:05:00 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id l01L3A0b028824; Mon, 1 Jan 2007 21:03:10 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l01KwqDt018213 for ; Mon, 1 Jan 2007 20:58:53 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47FB1642BF for ; Mon, 1 Jan 2007 20:58:52 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -2.341 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.341 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.258, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LWoUhcHyZoXb for ; Mon, 1 Jan 2007 20:58:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ppsw-9.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-9.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.139]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B4DE64799 for ; Mon, 1 Jan 2007 20:58:45 +0000 (UTC) X-Cam-SpamDetails: Not scanned X-Cam-AntiVirus: No virus found X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/ Received: from cpc4-cmbg1-0-0-cust9.cmbg.cable.ntl.com ([82.21.108.10]:57328 helo=maya) by ppsw-9.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.159]:25) with esmtpsa (LOGIN:spb42) (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) id 1H1UEt-0002mD-UE (Exim 4.63) for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org (return-path ); Mon, 01 Jan 2007 20:58:35 +0000 Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 21:12:47 +0000 From: Stephen Bennett To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-dev] RFC: making USE_EXPANDed variables incremental Message-ID: <20070101211247.730788c9@maya> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.6.1 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "S.P. Bennett" X-Archives-Salt: a59651a2-41bb-4924-8fd5-d411c61e0533 X-Archives-Hash: c3485b8836f9b0b05e5b685bd8b31efc Following a discussion in #gentoo-portage earlier this evening, it was suggested that I send out an RFC email for this. So, does anyone object to requiring that any variable listed in USE_EXPAND be treated as incremental, at least as far as profile inheritance is concerned? -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list